On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 09:15:47AM -0800, Doug Jones wrote:
John Carmack wrote:
http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=232
Solvay Ultra-Pure works fine for our mixed-monoprop system.
Re: your invisible plume issues, since you guys have such an
electronics bent, maybe
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Jim Richardson wrote:
...Most CCDs are pretty sensitive to near IR, and so the
manufacturer puts in a filter to correct for normal human colour
perception.
...and to minimize problems with the fact that certain fabrics often used
in clothing are opaque to visible light but
The next meeting of the Experimental Rocket Propulsion Society will be
held this THURSDAY evening at the Bowers Denny's starting at 8:00pm.
Items for meeting #272 (20 Nov 2003):
- Admin Teams
- CMT
- Documentation
- IT
- Liaisons
- Logistics
- PAO
I have a baby monitor from Sears. The camaera has the
LEDs around the CCD and I can see the baby perfect in
the dark. The set costs about $100 and it is 2.4ghz.
--- Sander Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose you could use one of those sub $100
security cams. Those typically
have IR
Do you have a 2.4 GHz portable phone? Wifi? I have both and as a result I
saw terrible interference in the image. Then again mine was an X10 which is
bottom of the barrel as far as quality is concerned.
Sander
- Original Message -
From: Thomas McNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ERPS
Only the microwave really messes it up, but it
comes with 3 channel settings so if something besides
it bothers it I just change it.
--- Sander Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have a 2.4 GHz portable phone? Wifi? I have
both and as a result I
saw terrible interference in the image.
