On Jul 5, 2009, at 7:52 AM, Christian Plesner Hansen wrote:
Custom literals is a nasty problem. To work with decimal literals,
for instance, the compiler can't be allowed to interpret numeric
constants; that has to be delegated to the decimal library.
To clarify, we wouldn't make 123 or 3.14
> Operators are currently hardcoded in the language, but the specification
> could be recast using multimethods or double dispach and then extended to
> allow users to define operators on new "types" -- but what would be the
> nature of those types?
>
> Anything like a number (primitive, as you not
2 matches
Mail list logo
