On 15/12/2009, at 13:51, P T Withington wrote:
(...)
I once had the vain hope that I could say:
function MyArray () {}
MyArray.prototype = [];
to create my own subclasses of Array. That might have lessened the need for
isArrayLike.
For that, we'd need an Array.create(). It might be
On Dec 15, 2009, at 4:51 AM, P T Withington wrote:
On 2009-12-08, at 13:10, Mike Samuel wrote:
All true. And yet it is not uncommon. See the bottom of this email
for a quick survey of a number of libraries' uses of the array-like
concept.
FWIW, Here is the (separately/simultaneously
On Dec 15, 2009, at 5:05 AM, Jorge Chamorro wrote:
On 15/12/2009, at 13:51, P T Withington wrote:
(...)
I once had the vain hope that I could say:
function MyArray () {}
MyArray.prototype = [];
to create my own subclasses of Array. That might have lessened the
need for isArrayLike.
For
On 15/12/2009, at 16:21, Brendan Eich wrote:
On Dec 15, 2009, at 5:05 AM, Jorge Chamorro wrote:
On 15/12/2009, at 13:51, P T Withington wrote:
(...)
I once had the vain hope that I could say:
function MyArray () {}
MyArray.prototype = [];
to create my own subclasses of Array. That
On Dec 15, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Jorge Chamorro wrote:
It's the same functionality provided by Object.create(), but for []
instead of {}.
Ah, that helps -- thanks. This is not exactly what Tucker showed,
though.
Tucker is looking for a way to compose custom [[Put]] with
prototype-based
On Dec 14, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Ash Berlin wrote:
On 14 Dec 2009, at 22:44, Mike Samuel wrote:
It would be convenient for some DSL use cases to allow
LineTerminators inside code, but it is unclear how this will
interact with revision control systems that rewrite newlines on
checkout
If
Hi,
Could you motivate why you chose to append the string Quasi to the type
tag identifier? I.e.:
The QFN of
*QuasiTypeTag*http://wiki.ecmascript.org/lib/exe/fetch.php?id=strawman%3Aquasiscache=cachemedia=strawman:quasi-strawman.html#pr-QuasiTypeTag::
*Identifier* is the concatenation of
2009/12/15 Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com:
On Dec 14, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Ash Berlin wrote:
On 14 Dec 2009, at 22:44, Mike Samuel wrote:
It would be convenient for some DSL use cases to allow LineTerminators
inside code, but it is unclear how this will interact with revision control
systems
2009/12/15 Tom Van Cutsem to...@google.com:
Hi,
Could you motivate why you chose to append the string Quasi to the type
tag identifier? I.e.:
The QFN of QuasiTypeTag :: Identifier is the concatenation of Identifier
and the string Quasi. The result is a valid Identifier.
I know E employs
Brendan Eich wrote:
In ES specs and real implementations, internal methods and various
corresponding implementation hooks are called based on [[Class]] of the
directly referenced object, in contrast.
In ES specs, there's no indication that [[Class]] can or should be used
for internal method
On Dec 15, 2009, at 11:18 AM, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote:
Brendan Eich wrote:
In ES specs and real implementations, internal methods and various
corresponding implementation hooks are called based on [[Class]] of
the
directly referenced object, in contrast.
In ES specs, there's no
Mike Samuel wrote:
2009/12/15 Tom Van Cutsem to...@google.com:
Hi,
Could you motivate why you chose to append the string Quasi to the type
tag identifier? [...]
I know E employs a similar mechanism, but I don't know if it's worth having
it for Javascript.
Essentially, this is a form of
Brendan Eich wrote:
On Dec 15, 2009, at 11:18 AM, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote:
Brendan Eich wrote:
In ES specs and real implementations, internal methods and various
corresponding implementation hooks are called based on [[Class]] of the
directly referenced object, in contrast.
[...]
Sorry, I
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Mike Samuel mikesam...@gmail.com wrote:
One possibility is to make the tags uppercase by convention:
HTML`...`;
XML`...`;
SQL`...`;
Since language names are very often acronyms, this looks perfectly
natural (and I think it looks fine even when
14 matches
Mail list logo
