Apologies for not replying to the thread properly; just joined the list.
The typed array proposal Vlad sent out covers the WebGL use case and
others which assemble data on the CPU to be handed to, for example, a
graphics or audio subsystem.
I've seen some feedback that the proposal misses an impo
Hello P,
>Scope chain (f): [
> global,
> {foo: undefined, bar: undefined},
> {foo: 20, test: function () {...}},
> {activation object of 'f' context}
>]
Sorry, scope chain of 'f' context sure will *not* contain object added by the
'with' statement (my typo), scope chain above was described fo
Hello P,
Saturday, February 6, 2010, 1:14:33 AM, you wrote:
> ({
> 'foo': 20,
> 'test': function () {
> var f = function () {
> alert("foo:"+ foo);
> alert("this.foo:"+ this.foo);
> alert("bar:"+ bar);
> }
> with (this) {
> var foo = 42;
> var
On 2010-02-05, at 17:42, P T Withington wrote:
>>>
>>> Flash 10 gives me the answer I expected. I have not tested other JS
>>> engines.
>>
>> Flash 10 bug.
>
> I will report. Thanks.
FTR, appears to be already reported as:
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-2257
_
On 2010-02-05, at 17:25, Brendan Eich wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2010, at 2:14 PM, P T Withington wrote:
>
>> ({
>> 'foo': 20,
>> 'test': function () {
>> var f = function () {
>> alert("foo:"+ foo);
>> alert("this.foo:"+ this.foo);
>> alert("bar:"+ bar);
>> }
>> with (this) {
>> va
On Feb 5, 2010, at 2:14 PM, P T Withington wrote:
({
'foo': 20,
'test': function () {
var f = function () {
alert("foo:"+ foo);
alert("this.foo:"+ this.foo);
alert("bar:"+ bar);
}
with (this) {
var foo = 42;
var bar = 21;
f.call(this);
}
"Doctor, it
({
'foo': 20,
'test': function () {
var f = function () {
alert("foo:"+ foo);
alert("this.foo:"+ this.foo);
alert("bar:"+ bar);
}
with (this) {
var foo = 42;
var bar = 21;
f.call(this);
}
}
}).test();
--
By my reading, `foo` and
7 matches
Mail list logo
