On March 04, 2010 11:07 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
Right. I was explicit about hypothesizing an ecosystem solution,
independent of the standard and predicated on fast JS engines. This is
not meant to preempt your great work making RegExp incrementally better.
We (by which I mean "you" with edit
On March 04, 2010 11:40 AM, Andy Chu wrote:
Regarding "RegEx", I'm pretty certain Brendan was talking about a
hypothetical new library (name unimportant) that the JavaScript community
might create in the future. I don't think anyone has suggested adding a
I worked on something like this:
http:
> Regarding "RegEx", I'm pretty certain Brendan was talking about a
> hypothetical new library (name unimportant) that the JavaScript community
> might create in the future. I don't think anyone has suggested adding a
I worked on something like this:
http://code.google.com/p/json-pattern/ . It is
On Mar 3, 2010, at 11:44 PM, Steve L. wrote:
(If it's really a goal to create an entirely new RegEx (no p) class,
those things could be addressed there. Although I think that
proposal
is problematic too since it is a burden on implementers to have 1.5
regex implementations.)
Regarding "Reg
4 matches
Mail list logo
