On Jun 5, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Peter Michaux wrote:
(I remember the idea of being able to write String.new rather than
having to write String['new'] was discussed in the past. I don't
know if keywords as bare object keys are allowed in ECMAScript but it
seems to work in Firefox.)
It's in ES5.
On 05.06.2011 22:00, Peter Michaux wrote:
ES has new Constructor() as its basic syntax for construction. This
means that if other constructors are also beneficial that the syntax
to call them is inconsistent. For example, ES3 had the
String.fromCharCode and ES5 added Object.create.
This is a
On Jun 3, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Juriy Zaytsev wrote:
Chrome (13) and Safari (5) tolerate n. No error.
Bugs filed?
/be
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
The point is to encourage people to write *more* well-thought-out proposals
than can fit in an email, not less. Hence Allen's suggestion of blogs,
websites, or github. If language design issues can be resolved in bursts of 140
characters then I think I will need to find a new line of work. ;)
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Jun 3, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Juriy Zaytsev wrote:
Chrome (13) and Safari (5) tolerate n. No error.
Bugs filed?
WebKit bug — https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41614
Seems to be stalled. cc'ing Oliver.
--
Are static members inherited? What happens in the last line of the
following code?
class Monster {
static allMonsters = [];
constructor() {
Monster.allMonsters.push(this);
}
}
class Dragon extends Monster {
constructor() {}
}
new
From the harmony classes example copied below for reference.
The set health(value) {...} assigns a new value to this.health. But health is a
private property, so the assignment is setting a public property. Shouldn't the
assignment be private(this).health = value?
class Monster {
// The
7 matches
Mail list logo
