My opinion can be summarized as follows: The operator is really useful, we need
it or at least its functionality (alternatively, as a method). I suspect that
the patterns are better supported via class literals that hides the details via
sugaring, but they elegantly illustrate why the operator
From: Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com
Date: July 19, 2011 21:16:29 GMT+02:00
To: Luke Hoban lu...@microsoft.com
Cc: es-discuss@mozilla.org es-discuss@mozilla.org
Subject: Re: An extend operator is a natural companion to |
On Jul 19, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Luke Hoban wrote:
The arguments
From: Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com
Date: July 19, 2011 18:59:04 GMT+02:00
To: Sean Eagan seaneag...@gmail.com
Cc: es-discuss es-discuss@mozilla.org
Subject: Re: An extend operator is a natural companion to |
owns is ambiguous -- could still delegate. Can't use extends, the
direction
I have comments on some of these.
Mark
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 01:29, Norbert Lindenberg
ecmascr...@norbertlindenberg.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm sorry for not having been able to contribute to the
internationalization API earlier. I finally have reviewed
Hi Luke,
The idea is definitely to subsume typed arrays as completely as possible.
* Array types of fixed length
The current design fixes the length of an ArrayType instance as part of the
ArrayType definition, instead of as a parameter to the resulting constructor.
I'm not sure I
5 matches
Mail list logo
