my point was: no need to have pow in Number.prototype, imo
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.comwrote:
On Jan 25, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
Number.prototype.pow = function pow(radix) {
return Math.pow(this, radix);
};
On 26 January 2012 01:11, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
The following proposal questions the validity of the teeshirt maxim Let is
the new var as a rationale for treating global |let| declarations similarly
to ES=5 global |var| declarations. While we want people to use |let|
On 26 January 2012 17:47, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2012, at 3:01 AM, Andreas Rossberg wrote:
Overlapping imports? That's the first time I hear about that. That
might be rather difficult, given that modules are recursive.
It's just something I threw in that the
Andreas Rossberg mailto:rossb...@google.com
January 26, 2012 11:26 AM
On 26 January 2012 17:47, Allen Wirfs-Brockal...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2012, at 3:01 AM, Andreas Rossberg wrote:
Overlapping imports? That's the first time I hear about that. That
might be rather difficult, given
Why would you write
alert(2..pow(3)); // 8
?
You would simply write 8 right away...
But when you work with numbers, they're stored in variables and it works :
var a = 2;
a.pow( 3 );
And anyway, you can still write
(2).pow( 3 );
And about the possibility to implement them in pure JS, you
JS's Math namespace-object and its methods were modeled on JDK1.0
java.lang.Math. This won't change. I see little benefit and too much
cost relative to it in duplicating (with curried |this|) the functions
into Number.prototype.
If there were a popular library that did this, it might help.
On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
Andreas Rossberg mailto:rossb...@google.com
January 26, 2012 11:26 AM
...
I still like the idea of cross-script shadowing (aka nested scopes),
but one concern was that it is not clear what names would be in scope
for, say, a piece of JS
On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Andreas Rossberg wrote:
On 26 January 2012 17:47, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2012, at 3:01 AM, Andreas Rossberg wrote:
Overlapping imports? That's the first time I hear about that. That
might be rather difficult, given that modules
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:51 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
We could say event handler attributes are scoped by the most-nested
scope -- the scope due to the last script element that was closed
before the element with the event handler attribute was processed.
This means
9 matches
Mail list logo
