On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
> It'd be great if there was material on the limits of the JVM and the CLR.
> AFAICT these are the only virtual machines that are trying to be universal
> (run both static and dynamic languages well).
>
Well, from experience, the JVM is/wa
It'd be great if there was material on the limits of the JVM and the CLR.
AFAICT these are the only virtual machines that are trying to be universal (run
both static and dynamic languages well).
[[[Sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity and typos.]]]
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
a...@rauschm
Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
What is the best “bytecode isn’t everything” article that exists? The
“the web needs bytecode” meme comes up incredibly often, I’d like to
have something good to point to, as an answer.
This one looks good:
http://mozakai.blogspot.de/2013/05/the-elusive-universal-web-b
How are they related? Wouldn't that affect Object.defineProperty only if
someone passes it an object inheriting from array, for which I can't think any
valid reason for.
Andri
On May 14, 2014, at 8:10 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
wrote:
> I like we keep adding `get` and `set` here and there but I h
Same "any valid reason" inheritance should be considered for descriptors
... I didn't want to go off topic too much, just remind that these methods
name have a very important meaning in some case.
Best Regards
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Andri Möll wrote:
> How are they related? Wouldn't
What is the best “bytecode isn’t everything” article that exists? The “the web
needs bytecode” meme comes up incredibly often, I’d like to have something good
to point to, as an answer.
This one looks good:
http://mozakai.blogspot.de/2013/05/the-elusive-universal-web-bytecode.html
Thanks!
Axe
I like we keep adding `get` and `set` here and there but I hope we are not
forgetting to fix descriptors inheritance problem where any `get` or `set`
can compromise `Object.defineProperty` operations (just a gently reminder
that `get` and `set` if inherited can cause many troubles in ES5 like
opera
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Till Schneidereit <
t...@tillschneidereit.net> wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Mathias Bynens wrote:
>
>> Previous discussion on this topic:
>> http://esdiscuss.org/topic/array-prototype-last
>>
>> We should look at how existing utility libraries handle t
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Mathias Bynens wrote:
> Previous discussion on this topic:
> http://esdiscuss.org/topic/array-prototype-last
>
> We should look at how existing utility libraries handle this behavior and
> base any proposals on that IMHO. Underscore and Lo-Dash have [`_.first`](
>
9 matches
Mail list logo