Re: Move es-discuss to discuss.webplatform.org?

Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote: On Jun 22, 2015, at 12:51 PM, C. Scott Ananian > wrote: It's not too surprising: it's the same reason why the ES6 spec was just published *on paper*, with the html version being explicitly flagged as non-normative. Actually the abov

Re: Move es-discuss to discuss.webplatform.org?

> On Jun 22, 2015, at 12:51 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote: > > It's not too surprising: it's the same reason why the ES6 spec was just > published *on paper*, with the html version being explicitly flagged as > non-normative. > > Actually the above is not correct. Both the HTML and PDF render

Re: Pick operator

Bob Myers schrieb: In the spirit of the discussion about language complexity and extensibility, consider the following brain-addled, pre-strawman proposal for a new pick operator. http://rtm.github.io/boberator.html Thanks, some quite interesting ideas! Some quick thoughts while reading: * `o

Re: Move es-discuss to discuss.webplatform.org?

It's not too surprising: it's the same reason why the ES6 spec was just published *on paper*, with the html version being explicitly flagged as non-normative. For standards work, having a reliable substrate is important. It is not the TC's job to innovate on or experiment with collaboration platf

Re: Move es-discuss to discuss.webplatform.org?

On Jun 22, 2015, at 3:22 PM, Russell Leggett wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:21 PM, // ravi wrote: >> On Jun 19, 2015, at 5:12 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote: >> > >> > No, thank you.​ >> > Email clients are the ultimate forum aggregators. >> >> +1 on “No, thank you". Email works, email has are

Re: Move es-discuss to discuss.webplatform.org?

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:21 PM, // ravi wrote: > On Jun 19, 2015, at 5:12 PM, C. Scott Ananian > wrote: > > > > No, thank you.​ > > Email clients are the ultimate forum aggregators. > > > +1 on “No, thank you". Email works, email has are full-featured clients, > do not force browser use, etc, e

Re: Move es-discuss to discuss.webplatform.org?

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:44 AM Alan Schmitt wrote: > ...other email clients may also have this feature. > And you can mute whole threads in Gmail (and Inbox). https://support.google.com/mail/answer/47787?hl=en ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@m

Re: Move es-discuss to discuss.webplatform.org?

On 2015-06-20 16:14, Eric B writes: > The main problem I have with mailing lists is that, unless I'm mistaken, I > cannot unsubscribe from specific threads. As an example, "The Tragedy of the > Common Lisp, or, Why Large Languages Explode" is now 33 replies deep and I > really don't care about it

Re: Unbound arrow functions?

The thing I liked about thin arrows (other than the conciseness) was the lack of a prototype object, thus automatically throwing on construct and having similar behaviour to native functions. Concise methods and fat arrows already have this behaviour, but if you want to add such a method to an alr