Le 23 juin 2015 à 14:58, Gary Guo nbdd0...@hotmail.com a écrit :
To me it seems that spread expression will not call IteratorClose (neither in
ArrayLiteral nor in Argument List), but IteratorClose is called in other
places in the spec where iterators are used, ex. for-of, destructuring,
To me it seems that spread expression will not call IteratorClose (neither in
ArrayLiteral nor in Argument List), but IteratorClose is called in other places
in the spec where iterators are used, ex. for-of, destructuring, builtin
functions). Is this intended or this is a bug in the spec?
Gary
Le 20 juin 2015 à 06:30, Bob Myers r...@gol.com a écrit :
In the spirit of the discussion about language complexity and extensibility,
consider the following brain-addled, pre-strawman proposal for a new pick
operator.
http://rtm.github.io/boberator.html
If not, does Discourse support email as a first-class subscription
mechanism? That (plus mute) might help.
I haven't used discourse a ton, but according to the features page:
http://www.discourse.org/about/
They support email notifications and replies, as well as an opt in mailing
list
Yup the ability to subscribe to categories, ignore users and mute threads.
Along with the ability to set digest periods.
Here are all the options I get in preferences:
Along with the ability to mute each thread too.
On 23 June 2015 at 02:17, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.org wrote:
Allen
Jonathan Kingston wrote:
(I don't think any such es-discuss
replacement should be on webplatform.org http://webplatform.org/,
FWIW -- that crosses the W3C
and Ecma streams.)
Is that such an issue? I was thinking the larger exposure and closer
working would be a bigger benefit than the mail
On Jun 23, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.org wrote:
Jonathan Kingston wrote:
(I don't think any such es-discuss
replacement should be on webplatform.org http://webplatform.org/, FWIW --
that crosses the W3C
and Ecma streams.)
Is that such an issue? I was thinking the
OTOH I know people (dherman, cough) who can't hack the email load of
es-discuss, and do not like the well-known email tendency to have threads run
off the rails into endless digression and argumentation.
But Arv's point about gmail mute feature is good. I think any competent email
reader
Let's talk about this at July's TC39 meeting. Maybe we can have best of
both worlds, thanks to Discourse. (I don't think any such es-discuss
replacement should be on webplatform.org, FWIW -- that crosses the W3C
and Ecma streams.)
Having two es-dis{cuss,course} list-like things is not great.
(I don't think any such es-discuss
replacement should be on webplatform.org, FWIW -- that crosses the W3C
and Ecma streams.)
Is that such an issue? I was thinking the larger exposure and closer
working would be a bigger benefit than the mail management options.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:10 PM
Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
My biggest concern is that you can’t be selective in your consumption
of es-discuss: It’s all or nothing (even if you only want to
participate occasionally). The volume is daunting, esp. with a mobile
device.
Long ago we had USENET and NNTP to help avoid having to
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
Or perhaps ecaa could host.
Ecma? HAHAHAHA! Ahem. Sorry. Judging from the IT outsourcing our people
in Geneva do, I can only say: nope!
Am I being unfair? Their Francs are as gold/green/orange/etc.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banknotes_of_the_Swiss_franc) as
12 matches
Mail list logo
