Thanks. Reading now.
I'm clearly bad at email :/
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Rick Waldron wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:41 PM SaamBarati1 wrote:
>
>> Hi Allen,
>>
>> What were the requirements for the global lexical scope? Is it written
>> somewhere I can read? I came up empty aft
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:41 PM SaamBarati1 wrote:
> Hi Allen,
>
> What were the requirements for the global lexical scope? Is it written
> somewhere I can read? I came up empty after a quick search of
> esdiscuss.org.
>
> I think the whole point of ES6 lexical scoping is to limit scope to
> some
Hi Allen,
What were the requirements for the global lexical scope? Is it written
somewhere I can read? I came up empty after a quick search of esdiscuss.org.
I think the whole point of ES6 lexical scoping is to limit scope to something
you can read in a given file (or script, or block, or eval,
On Sep 1, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
>> The possible semantics of global lexical declarations was extensively
>> explored by TC39 before we make the final design decisions for ES6. The
>> scoping of global lexical declarations is something we spent many hours
>> discussing over
> The possible semantics of global lexical declarations was extensively
> explored by TC39 before we make the final design decisions for ES6. The
> scoping of global lexical declarations is something we spent many hours
> discussing over a span of several years, including:
To be fair, some p
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> Both the alternative suggest by Jason and the one suggest by Saam were
> considered and rejected in these discussions. It's easy to imagine a
> different semantics. It's harder to demonstrate that it is a "better
> semantics" and to get ag
On Aug 31, 2015, at 7:11 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
>
> We are in rapid-release hell/heaven.
>
> This means errata can be issued, and engines can implement the better
> resolution for those errata, compared to what the last major-version _de
> jure_ spec mandated.
Yes. Obviously the bar is very, very
7 matches
Mail list logo