Re: How should operator overloading work?

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Nicolas B. Pierron wrote: > Note, do we want to distinguish the binary operator Symbol['_+_'] from > the unary operator Symbol['+_']. > Also, I am not sure how extendable the language is, especially if we > are looking for operators

Re: Backward running version look-behinds

On 12/11/2015 13:16, Nozomu Katō wrote: I wonder if the person who wrote the spec for RegExp is on this list. I would like to ask one question: Was there any reason why the following steps were defined in the present order: 21.2.2.4 Alternative The production Alternative :: Alternative Term

Re: How should operator overloading work?

Note, do we want to distinguish the binary operator Symbol['_+_'] from the unary operator Symbol['+_']. Also, I am not sure how extendable the language is, especially if we are looking for operators like Symbol['_>>=_']. On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Coroutines wrote: