Re: meeting notes for march 2016?

2016-04-20 Thread John Lenz
great, I was expecting an announcement here. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Michael Ficarra wrote: > The notes have already been posted at > https://github.com/tc39/tc39-notes/tree/4d5fb147e6b714f682aaf5da803ca14ec5fb3b82/es7/2016-03 > . > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016

Re: Function#toString revision: JSDoc comments?

2016-04-20 Thread Garrett Smith
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Caitlin Potter wrote: > How would that interact with angular.js' Function.prototype.toString > parsing? Seems like doing that could break some content, even if it were > useful > Comments are generally a failure of the developer to write

Re: Re: New Assignment Operators (Not bit-wise OR)

2016-04-20 Thread Brandon Andrews
Perhaps this proposal might fit with what you had in mind: https://esdiscuss.org/topic/proposal-for-a-null-coalescing-operator Been meaning to clean this up and submit it as an actual proposal since the idea is kind of simple: https://github.com/sirisian/ecmascript-null-coalescing-operator

Re: meeting notes for march 2016?

2016-04-20 Thread Michael Ficarra
The notes have already been posted at https://github.com/tc39/tc39-notes/tree/4d5fb147e6b714f682aaf5da803ca14ec5fb3b82/es7/2016-03 . On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:45 AM, John Lenz wrote: > Any update on this? > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Rick Waldron

Re: meeting notes for march 2016?

2016-04-20 Thread John Lenz
Any update on this? On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Rick Waldron wrote: > Where are they? I haven't seen anyone post them for approval. > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:39 PM Jordan Harband wrote: > >> The notes were taken, but have not yet been approved

Re: Function#toString revision: JSDoc comments?

2016-04-20 Thread Axel Rauschmayer
My initial motivation was to create a Python-style help() function. But I agree that it’s probably better not to depend on this mechanism. > On 16 Apr 2016, at 19:28, Jordan Harband wrote: > > As I see it, the primary purpose of the `Function#toString` proposal is to >

Re: Function#toString revision: JSDoc comments?

2016-04-20 Thread Axel Rauschmayer
Right. That’s a compelling argument against my suggestion. > On 16 Apr 2016, at 16:53, Caitlin Potter wrote: > > How would that interact with angular.js' Function.prototype.toString parsing? > Seems like doing that could break some content, even if it were useful > >