Re: Proposal: Conditional `catch` in Promises

I agree this isn't ideal (it's a design hack that wasn't very well thought through on the part of Bluebird IMHO), but not on your justification (which comes across as borderline off-topic). Most complex exception handling with promises are effectively handled using async/await, but I agree the

Re: Proposal: Conditional `catch` in Promises

> On 26 Apr 2018, at 12:08 PM, Ayush Gupta wrote: > > It might be worth **explicitly** mentioning that it's not about types either, > the benefit with using functions as the filter is that we can tackle a lot of > cases. Consider this: > > ```js > return somePromise >