Re: Fixing the associativity / precedence of the instanceof operator

I’m on the same page as Charles. I feel like it should be okay to fix something like this … at least in strict mode. Or introduce a tiny bit of new grammar supporting something like `foo ! instanceof Foo` (or `foo not instanceof Foo`) maybe? - Jonathan — Sent from Mailbox On Tue, Aug 26, 20

Re: Module Default Export Syntax

Kevin, you're not alone :) . I like that last form, too. - Jonathan — Sent from Mailbox On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote: > I do like the conciseness of the last form. The other forms do indeed not > seem very useful. > On Jun 25, 2014, at 5:45 , Kevin Smith wrote: >>

Re: Basic set operations?

Yes ... +++1. - Jonathan — Sent from Mailbox On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Hemanth H.M wrote: > Would it be useful to implement basic set operations as below? > * merge > * subset? > * superset? > * union > * intersection > * complements > * difference > * cartesian > * copy > So on