As the maintainer of the ClojureScript compiler this doesn't sound like
much of a simplification. The sum total of source map support in
ClojureScript is < 400 lines of Clojure. To support what's being proposed
would add a significant amount of complexity for something we don't care
about at all -
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:35 PM, David Herman wrote:
> Agreed. This is easy to spec and implement, highly composable (it fits
> neatly into the algebra of destructuring patterns everywhere, as opposed to
> just in object property-name positions), has no problems with side effects,
> and does not
http://www.dartlang.org/docs/spec/latest/dart-language-specification.html
If you look at the changes since 0.6 you'll see they added call for
function emulation.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
> The original post in this thread, from David Nolen, cited
&
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
> We've supported destructuring for years and no one has asked for this. I
> say YAGNI and when in doubt, leave it out. One can always write two
> destructuring declarations without much repetition:
>
But who has been using it? Certainly not
This extremely useful feature is under discussion for Dart as well.
David
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Michael Fogus wrote:
> I know some things about ClojureScript and would be happy to answer
> any direct questions. However, I think its notion (and Clojure proper)
> is that "functions are
5 matches
Mail list logo
