Sorry, just seen this thread and thought it worth mentioning a similar thread
ongoing here that has derived from wanting to remove less popular features from
the specification:
https://esdiscuss.org/topic/removal-of-language-features
We should definitely continue this conversation in this threa
ot;application/javascript.2" ?
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: David White [mailto:david.rhys.wh...@icloud.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 7:35 PM
> To: doodad-js Admin
> Subject: Re: Removal of language features
>
> That’s an interesting proposal but I’m strug
runtime in order to allow the language to progress more natrurally?
> On 23 Jul 2017, at 23:38, doodad-js Admin wrote:
>
> Maybe that's time to start a new major version of JS?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David White [mailto:david.rhys.wh...@icloud.com]
> Sen
Lots of good thoughts and discussions here, and while it’s gone slightly off
topic I’d love to discuss the possibilities of how we could get JavaScript to a
point where we could actively remove features with every new specification.
I’m sure nobody would want to break the web, which would be ver
Hi,
I’m just curious as there are a lot of proposals for the addition of features
to the ES specification, is there any scope for requests to remove language
features? Going via the same means of writing a proposition that would attempt
to support the removal of a feature, ultimately simplifyi
Too many operators can become quite confusing, having worked with many
functional languages I find the number of operators more of a hinder than help.
I’m very pro functional operators when they help me read the code explicitly
rather than implicitly, for example with the `|>` pipeline operator,
issues/33#issuecomment-306986211
>
> <https://github.com/gilbert/es-pipeline-operator/issues/33#issuecomment-306986211>
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:02 PM, David White <mailto:david.rhys.wh...@icloud.com>> wrote:
> Piping is useful when composing many small pure functions to
Piping is useful when composing many small pure functions together, one problem
with this is the evaluation needs to be read from the inner most expression
value in reverse to the outer most function call. Given the following statement
we can see that it would be read as 'call math round then ca
8 matches
Mail list logo
