Message-
>From: P T Withington [mailto:p...@pobox.com]
>Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 11:34 AM
>To: Brendan Eich
>Cc: Allen Wirfs-Brock; Mark S. Miller; es-discuss@mozilla.org
>Subject: Re: (function foo(){}).propertyIsEnumerable("prototype"): true
>or false?
On 2009-09-04, at 13:24, Brendan Eich wrote:
I hope it doesn't break anything on the web. It could, because using
for-in to inspect properties and extend base objects with copies of
them is standard practice (Doug's "Swiss inheritance", search for
"Swiss" in http://www.cosmik.com/aa-october
On Sep 3, 2009, at 8:48 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
ES3, 15.3.5.2, says the prototype property of function instances is
enumerable.
ES5, 13.2 step 17, says the prototype property of function
instances is not enumerable.
ES5, 15.3.5.2 also says non-enumerable so at least it is internally
la.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Walden
>Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 8:15 PM
>To: Mark S. Miller
>Cc: es-discuss@mozilla.org
>Subject: Re: (function foo(){}).propertyIsEnumerable("prototype"): true
>or false?
>
>On 3.9.09 20:04 , Mark S. Miller wrote:
>> I don'
On 3.9.09 20:04 , Mark S. Miller wrote:
I don't remember discussing this. But if we had, our general principle
is that we first need to be compatible with the cross-browser web, and
only second with the text of the ES3 standard. A bit of testing
reveals that 'prototype' is enumerable on Firefox a
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jeff Walden wrote:
> ES3, 15.3.5.2, says the prototype property of function instances is
> enumerable.
>
> ES5, 13.2 step 17, says the prototype property of function instances is not
> enumerable.
>
> Was this change intentional, and if so, can someone point me to di
ES3, 15.3.5.2, says the prototype property of function instances is enumerable.
ES5, 13.2 step 17, says the prototype property of function instances is not
enumerable.
Was this change intentional, and if so, can someone point me to discussion of
the change? I don't care one way or the other,
7 matches
Mail list logo
