>> dropping some of them.
>>
>> /Andreas
>>
>>
>> On 12 July 2015 at 10:26, Gary Guo wrote:
>>>
>>> This is not possible as it contracts with existing semantics. Wrap it with
>>> a function instead.
>>>
>>>
___
>> From: jbuca...@me.com
>> Subject: Allow `try…catch` blocks to return a value.
>> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:53:52 +0900
>> To: es-discuss@mozilla.org
>>
>>
>> Allow `try…catch` blocks to return a value.
>>
>> Sometimes I wrap a `try…ca
ing semantics. Wrap it with
> a function instead.
>
> --
> From: jbuca...@me.com
> Subject: Allow `try…catch` blocks to return a value.
> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:53:52 +0900
> To: es-discuss@mozilla.org
>
>
> Allow `try…catch` blocks to retur
This is not possible as it contracts with existing semantics. Wrap it with a
function instead.
From: jbuca...@me.com
Subject: Allow `try…catch` blocks to return a value.
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:53:52 +0900
To: es-discuss@mozilla.org
Allow `try…catch` blocks to return a value.Sometimes I wrap
Allow `try…catch` blocks to return a value.
Sometimes I wrap a `try…catch` in a function and return a value based in
whether there was an error or not.
It would be useful if you could use `return` inside a `try…catch` block to
accomplish the same.
```js
let stuff = try {
return
5 matches
Mail list logo