Benjamin Gruenbaum wrote:
An annual conference sounds like a great opportunity to discuss design
goals of languages and long term goals - I am a much less ambitious
man than you. I'm just thinking of small scope examples, to name 3 on
top of my head:
- The iteration protocol (PHP had a simil
An annual conference sounds like a great opportunity to discuss design
goals of languages and long term goals - I am a much less ambitious man
than you. I'm just thinking of small scope examples, to name 3 on top of my
head:
- The iteration protocol (PHP had a similar lengthy discussion about
som
On Jul 1, 2015, at 5:37 AM, Benjamin Gruenbaum wrote:
> So, this is something that has been bothering me for a while now.
>
> The TC, and the mailing list is full of some really smart people. However,
> smart people can overlook things too and smart people can spend months in a
> debate that
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Alex Kocharin wrote:
> People regularly suggest borrowing concepts from different languages here
> (we got arrow functions from coffee, generators are from python I believe).
>
And `@@species` is from smalltalk. (More or less.)
Lots of smalltalk influence, actu
The problem is that it's not always that the case that the individual
working on a particular feature has all the context about the feature in
other languages.
What I had in mind is a 3 v 3 with languages where you come in with a set
of questions about details and design choices in the language wi
People regularly suggest borrowing concepts from different languages here (we got arrow functions from coffee, generators are from python I believe). I don't see what more is there to achieve. 01.07.2015, 15:38, "Benjamin Gruenbaum" :So, this is something that has been bothering me for a while n
On 1 July 2015 at 14:37, Benjamin Gruenbaum wrote:
> So, this is something that has been bothering me for a while now.
>
> The TC, and the mailing list is full of some really smart people. However,
> smart people can overlook things too and smart people can spend months in a
> debate that other p
So, this is something that has been bothering me for a while now.
The TC, and the mailing list is full of some really smart people. However,
smart people can overlook things too and smart people can spend months in a
debate that other people already thought about.
Other languages have open proces
8 matches
Mail list logo
