On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:58 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Jan 19, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Waldemar Horwat wrote:
MarkM: If we're making a harmonizer, let's get rid of semicolon
insertion as well.
For the record, I argued
On Jan 20, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
I'd always considered the safest (at least to my mind) solution for removing
ASI would be to produce a syntax error at an point ASI would be necessary in
the existing spec.
This wouldn't require backtracking, and wouldn't produce any weird
Sure. This is the use noasi or use semicolons idea.
Or just no asi. /bikeshed
Dave
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:58 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
Some on TC39 want ASI gone, but I think we are better off leaving it alone
and working on clear added-value (and mostly non-breaking) Harmony changes,
as sketched in
http://brendaneich.com/2011/01/harmony-of-my-dreams/
I just finished
Here are my rough notes for today's meeting.
Waldemar
--
Internationalization standard: Part of E262 or separate track? Pros
and cons to each one, and either would be workable. There is a
substantial area of interaction (ES5 locale methods, normalization,
and such) between
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com wrote:
On Jan 19, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Waldemar Horwat wrote:
MarkM: If we're making a harmonizer, let's get rid of semicolon
insertion as well.
For the record, I argued that we have only a handful of fingers to count
6 matches
Mail list logo
