On 19 June 2015 at 23:04, Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de wrote:
http://discourse.specifiction.org/t/upcoming-migration/805
Would it make sense to move es-discuss to that upcoming site? I’m not
particularly fond of mailing lists and much prefer forums, especially
discourse-based ones.
If not, does Discourse support email as a first-class subscription
mechanism? That (plus mute) might help.
I haven't used discourse a ton, but according to the features page:
http://www.discourse.org/about/
They support email notifications and replies, as well as an opt in mailing
list
Yup the ability to subscribe to categories, ignore users and mute threads.
Along with the ability to set digest periods.
Here are all the options I get in preferences:
Along with the ability to mute each thread too.
On 23 June 2015 at 02:17, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.org wrote:
Allen
Jonathan Kingston wrote:
(I don't think any such es-discuss
replacement should be on webplatform.org http://webplatform.org/,
FWIW -- that crosses the W3C
and Ecma streams.)
Is that such an issue? I was thinking the larger exposure and closer
working would be a bigger benefit than the mail
On Jun 23, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.org wrote:
Jonathan Kingston wrote:
(I don't think any such es-discuss
replacement should be on webplatform.org http://webplatform.org/, FWIW --
that crosses the W3C
and Ecma streams.)
Is that such an issue? I was thinking the
OTOH I know people (dherman, cough) who can't hack the email load of
es-discuss, and do not like the well-known email tendency to have threads run
off the rails into endless digression and argumentation.
But Arv's point about gmail mute feature is good. I think any competent email
reader
Let's talk about this at July's TC39 meeting. Maybe we can have best of
both worlds, thanks to Discourse. (I don't think any such es-discuss
replacement should be on webplatform.org, FWIW -- that crosses the W3C
and Ecma streams.)
Having two es-dis{cuss,course} list-like things is not great.
(I don't think any such es-discuss
replacement should be on webplatform.org, FWIW -- that crosses the W3C
and Ecma streams.)
Is that such an issue? I was thinking the larger exposure and closer
working would be a bigger benefit than the mail management options.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:10 PM
Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
My biggest concern is that you can’t be selective in your consumption
of es-discuss: It’s all or nothing (even if you only want to
participate occasionally). The volume is daunting, esp. with a mobile
device.
Long ago we had USENET and NNTP to help avoid having to
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
Or perhaps ecaa could host.
Ecma? HAHAHAHA! Ahem. Sorry. Judging from the IT outsourcing our people
in Geneva do, I can only say: nope!
Am I being unfair? Their Francs are as gold/green/orange/etc.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banknotes_of_the_Swiss_franc) as
On Jun 22, 2015, at 12:51 PM, C. Scott Ananian ecmascr...@cscott.net wrote:
It's not too surprising: it's the same reason why the ES6 spec was just
published *on paper*, with the html version being explicitly flagged as
non-normative.
Actually the above is not correct. Both the HTML
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
On Jun 22, 2015, at 12:51 PM, C. Scott Ananian ecmascr...@cscott.net
mailto:ecmascr...@cscott.net wrote:
It's not too surprising: it's the same reason why the ES6 spec was
just published *on paper*, with the html version being explicitly
flagged as non-normative.
On 2015-06-20 16:14, Eric B neuros...@gmail.com writes:
The main problem I have with mailing lists is that, unless I'm mistaken, I
cannot unsubscribe from specific threads. As an example, The Tragedy of the
Common Lisp, or, Why Large Languages Explode is now 33 replies deep and I
really don't
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:21 PM, // ravi ravi-li...@g8o.net wrote:
On Jun 19, 2015, at 5:12 PM, C. Scott Ananian ecmascr...@cscott.net
wrote:
No, thank you.
Email clients are the ultimate forum aggregators.
+1 on “No, thank you. Email works, email has are full-featured clients,
do
On Jun 22, 2015, at 3:22 PM, Russell Leggett russell.legg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:21 PM, // ravi ravi-li...@g8o.net wrote:
On Jun 19, 2015, at 5:12 PM, C. Scott Ananian ecmascr...@cscott.net wrote:
No, thank you.
Email clients are the ultimate forum aggregators.
It's not too surprising: it's the same reason why the ES6 spec was just
published *on paper*, with the html version being explicitly flagged as
non-normative.
For standards work, having a reliable substrate is important. It is not
the TC's job to innovate on or experiment with collaboration
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:44 AM Alan Schmitt alan.schm...@polytechnique.org
wrote:
...other email clients may also have this feature.
And you can mute whole threads in Gmail (and Inbox).
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/47787?hl=en
___
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
No, thank you.
+1
Email clients are the ultimate forum aggregators.
--scott
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
I'm with Scott. Regardless, this conversation is a non-starter.
I started it, because I care about es-discuss. More information would be nice
as to why it is a non-starter.
--
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
a...@rauschma.de
rauschma.de
___
es-discuss
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de
wrote:
http://discourse.specifiction.org/t/upcoming-migration/805
Would it make sense to move es-discuss to that upcoming site? I’m not
particularly fond of mailing lists and much prefer forums, especially
discourse-based
The main problem I have with mailing lists is that, unless I'm mistaken, I
cannot unsubscribe from specific threads. As an example, The Tragedy of
the Common Lisp, or, Why Large Languages Explode is now 33 replies deep
and I really don't care about it at all and would rather not get spammed by
http://es-discourse.com already exists as an alternative place to discuss
things if one doesn't wish to email this list. It may be worth exploring
using that more fully before asking TC39 to consider an alternative to
their existing mailing list.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Eric B
The only thing I don't like is the fact it's mixed with what's on
discourse.specifiction.org. I post more on discourse.specifiction.org than
on ES-Discuss, meaning I'm more comfortable bothering the people with my
ideas there than on ES-Discuss.
Plainly because it's not always ES related.
On Jun 19, 2015, at 5:12 PM, C. Scott Ananian ecmascr...@cscott.net wrote:
No, thank you.
Email clients are the ultimate forum aggregators.
+1 on “No, thank you. Email works, email has are full-featured clients, do not
force browser use, etc, etc.
—ravi
--scott
OMG Yes please!!!
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de wrote:
http://discourse.specifiction.org/t/upcoming-migration/805
Would it make sense to move es-discuss to that upcoming site? I’m not
particularly fond of mailing lists and much prefer forums, especially
http://discourse.specifiction.org/t/upcoming-migration/805
http://discourse.specifiction.org/t/upcoming-migration/805
Would it make sense to move es-discuss to that upcoming site? I’m not
particularly fond of mailing lists and much prefer forums, especially
discourse-based ones.
--
Dr. Axel
No, thank you.
Email clients are the ultimate forum aggregators.
--scott
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
Yes, please. Also if like to take issue with everyone who prefers email
clients for the following reason: it's easier to allow people who want to
keep using email to do so while enabling a richer and more aggressive
experience for those who want it than it is the other way around
On Jun 19, 2015
Discourse has the options to keep the same level of email reporting, daily
aggregation and allowing for responses via mail.
I'm not sure I see the need for a new category there either, there are
already:
- JS
- asm.js
- APIs
- Architecture
There are a fair few structured conversations there that
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:12 PM C. Scott Ananian ecmascr...@cscott.net
wrote:
No, thank you.
Email clients are the ultimate forum aggregators.
I'm with Scott. Regardless, this conversation is a non-starter.
Rick
___
es-discuss mailing list
30 matches
Mail list logo
