On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:41 PM, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote:
> Again you seem to be confusing the "inherited soft fields" proposal with
> the *separate* proposal on desugaring the private name syntax to inherited
> soft fields.
I think I may have been misunderstanding what Mark was actually
proposin
On 2010-12-21 22:12, Brendan Eich wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2010, at 11:05 PM, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote:
Please retain all relevant attribution lines.
>> Brendan Eich wrote:
>>> The new equivalence under private names would be x[#.id] === x.id.
You said "under private names" here, but it should actua
2 matches
Mail list logo
