On 18 Sep 2013, at 21:05, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Mathias Bynens wrote:
>> After comparing the output, I noticed that both regular expressions are
>> identical except for the following: ECMAScript 5 allows U+2E2F VERTICAL
>> TILDE in `IdentifierStart` and `I
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Mathias Bynens wrote:
> After comparing the output, I noticed that both regular expressions are
> identical except for the following: ECMAScript 5 allows U+2E2F VERTICAL TILDE
> in `IdentifierStart` and `IdentifierPart`, but ECMAScript 6 / Unicode TR31
> doesn’t
> I had no intentions specific to U+2E2F when I proposed relying on UTR 31 -
> the change is simply the effect of the character properties that the Unicode
> Technical Committee assigned to this character.
>
> I don't think there's a real problem. U+2E2F was added in Unicode version
> 5.1. ECMA
I had no intentions specific to U+2E2F when I proposed relying on UTR 31 - the
change is simply the effect of the character properties that the Unicode
Technical Committee assigned to this character.
I don't think there's a real problem. U+2E2F was added in Unicode version 5.1.
ECMAScript 5.1 r
Thanks for filing. I don't recall any reason for this and it seems bad
to break compatibility.
It may be that Norbert and Allen just missed your post on Monday; cc'ing
them.
/be
Mathias Bynens wrote:
On 19 Aug 2013, at 11:25, Mathias Bynens wrote:
After comparing the output, I noticed th
On 19 Aug 2013, at 11:25, Mathias Bynens wrote:
> After comparing the output, I noticed that both regular expressions are
> identical except for the following: ECMAScript 5 allows U+2E2F VERTICAL TILDE
> in `IdentifierStart` and `IdentifierPart`, but ECMAScript 6 / Unicode TR31
> doesn’t.
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
