On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <
allen.wirfs-br...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Mark S. Miller [mailto:erig...@google.com]
> >Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:58 PM
> >
> >Good. So does anyone object to ES3.1-strict imposing the same
> >restri
>-Original Message-
>From: Mark S. Miller [mailto:erig...@google.com]
>Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 4:58 PM
>
>Good. So does anyone object to ES3.1-strict imposing the same
>restrictions on the magic name "arguments" as we will on "eval"?
>
In strict mode, "arguments" is already defin
-discuss
Subject: Re: assignment to eval in strict code
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Waldemar Horwat
mailto:walde...@google.com>> wrote:
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
Now that we have decided that all declarations of the identifier "eval" are
banned from strict code a related question
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> Now that we have decided that all declarations of the identifier
> "eval" are banned from strict code a related question has come up
> from one of the implementers of our strict mode prototype implementation.
> Why does Es3.1 still allow assignment to the identifier "eval
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Waldemar Horwat wrote:
> Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
>
>> Now that we have decided that all declarations of the identifier "eval"
>> are banned from strict code a related question has come up from one of the
>> implementers of our strict mode prototype implementation.
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
Now that we have decided that all declarations of the identifier “eval”
are banned from strict code a related question has come up from one of
the implementers of our strict mode prototype implementation.Why
does Es3.1 still allow assignment to the identifier “eval”
2009/2/12 Brendan Eich :
> I wouldn't worry about feature creep in terms of strict mode forbidding
> certain identifiers in unambiguous grammatical positions. Some
> implementations already have to work harder if arguments is the left-hand
> side of assignment within a function. Such parser tweaks
I wouldn't worry about feature creep in terms of strict mode
forbidding certain identifiers in unambiguous grammatical positions.
Some implementations already have to work harder if arguments is the
left-hand side of assignment within a function. Such parser tweaks are
also easier to get ri
I'd be happier with the restriction than without.
2009/2/12 Allen Wirfs-Brock
> Now that we have decided that all declarations of the identifier "eval"
> are banned from strict code a related question has come up from one of the
> implementers of our strict mode prototype implementation.Why
Now that we have decided that all declarations of the identifier "eval" are
banned from strict code a related question has come up from one of the
implementers of our strict mode prototype implementation.Why does Es3.1
still allow assignment to the identifier "eval" within strict code? Tha
10 matches
Mail list logo