On 03.10.2010 1:56, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
this.push.apply(this, [1, 2, 3]);
... , Dmitry, WTF :D
this.push(1, 2, 3);
easy :P
Ah, it was copy-pasted from more generic case when data came from arguments.
I still don't like the idea of injectable [[Class]] for user defined
objects
I don't know man, I kinda like the possibility, but I am pretty sure we
gonna end up trying to figure out via weird tricks if an Array is a native
one or not (e.g. Array.isReallyAnArray(obj)) ... however, it's good to have
more power than less ;-)
Regards,
Andrea Giammarchi
On Sun, Oct 3,
On 02/10/2010, at 22:51, Brendan Eich wrote:
On Oct 2, 2010, at 6:49 AM, Jorge wrote:
Why not simply spec an Array.create() ?
-no need to redefine what an array is.
It's not clear from kangax's blog post that an array with an extra object on
its prototype chain before Array.prototype
On 02/10/2010, at 15:29, Brendan Eich wrote:
On Sep 6, 2010, at 1:43 AM, Dmitry A. Soshnikov wrote:
For what to create a proxy? It's only for catch-traps (yes, it may be used
additionally to create a _catcher_ with Array [[Class]], but without
additions -- i.e. if a user wants just to
On 02.10.2010 17:29, Brendan Eich wrote:
On Sep 6, 2010, at 1:43 AM, Dmitry A. Soshnikov wrote:
For what to create a proxy? It's only for catch-traps (yes, it may be used additionally
to create a _catcher_ with Array [[Class]], but without additions -- i.e. if
a user wants just to inherit
On Oct 2, 2010, at 6:49 AM, Jorge wrote:
On 02/10/2010, at 15:29, Brendan Eich wrote:
On Sep 6, 2010, at 1:43 AM, Dmitry A. Soshnikov wrote:
For what to create a proxy? It's only for catch-traps (yes, it may be used
additionally to create a _catcher_ with Array [[Class]], but without
On Oct 2, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Alex Russell wrote:
On Oct 2, 2010, at 6:49 AM, Jorge wrote:
On 02/10/2010, at 15:29, Brendan Eich wrote:
On Sep 6, 2010, at 1:43 AM, Dmitry A. Soshnikov wrote:
For what to create a proxy? It's only for catch-traps (yes, it may be used
additionally to
On Oct 2, 2010, at 6:49 AM, Jorge wrote:
On 02/10/2010, at 15:29, Brendan Eich wrote:
On Sep 6, 2010, at 1:43 AM, Dmitry A. Soshnikov wrote:
For what to create a proxy? It's only for catch-traps (yes, it may be used
additionally to create a _catcher_ with Array [[Class]], but without
On 03.10.2010 0:58, Dmitry A. Soshnikov wrote:
On 03.10.2010 0:51, Brendan Eich wrote:
On Oct 2, 2010, at 6:49 AM, Jorge wrote:
On 02/10/2010, at 15:29, Brendan Eich wrote:
On Sep 6, 2010, at 1:43 AM, Dmitry A. Soshnikov wrote:
For what to create a proxy? It's only for catch-traps (yes,
this.push.apply(this, [1, 2, 3]);
... , Dmitry, WTF :D
this.push(1, 2, 3);
easy :P
I still don't like the idea of injectable [[Class]] for user defined
objects ... JS follows massive cross libraries approach ... please don't
create a chaos even worst than the one we already have with
I really don't like the idea of using proxies simply to essentially create an
array with a custom prototype.
My understanding of what is wanted (in terms of subtyping an array) is an
ability to have something like
var arr = new MyArray()
Where 'new MyArray' behaves in essentially the same
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
On Oct 1, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
On Oct 1, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
I really don't like the idea of using proxies simply to essentially
create an array with a custom prototype.
Implement
We have previously discussed the Proxy.create(handler, proto, className)
design and I think it's feasible. One issue is what should happen to the
proxy's [[ClassName]] when it becomes fixed. In the current design, a fixed
object proxy can be made indistinguishable from a regular object. That's no
13 matches
Mail list logo
