metaIn the following I'm going to use syntax from by class operator strawman:
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:class_operator However, the
basic idea should be applicable to several of the class declarations proposal
that are drifting about.
BTW, I'm pretty sure that this isn't
[snip]
let Point = class {
x: 0, //not really needed unless defining an object exemplar
y: 0,
new(x,y) {
this.x = x;
this.y=y;
}
};
Yes this is better, could we go one step further and allow for
Point.new(1,2)
to work instead of new Point(1,2).
If we just
Allen,
Yes, this makes sense and is desirable. ( the rationale being that the word
new in new Point can be connected to what is going to happen when the
code in new(){ ... } is executed )
Rick
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.comwrote:
On Nov 19, 2011, at
On Nov 19, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
metaIn the following I'm going to use syntax from by class operator
strawman: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:class_operator
However, the basic idea should be applicable to several of the class
declarations proposal that
On Nov 19, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
I like the idea of replacing the method name “constructor” with something
better, but “new” suggests instantiation *and* initialization to me. Is
“init” a possibility?
Who said anything about replacing?
If we are trying to match or sugar
I like the idea of replacing the method name “constructor” with something
better, but “new” suggests instantiation *and* initialization to me. Is
“init” a possibility?
Who said anything about replacing?
If we are trying to match or sugar the prototypal pattern, then whatever the
On Nov 19, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
I like the idea of replacing the method name “constructor” with something
better, but “new” suggests instantiation *and* initialization to me. Is
“init” a possibility?
Who said anything about replacing?
If we are trying to match or
On Nov 19, 2011, at 3:14 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
That's the point: it's not just a method. It is a special form. In classes as
proposed where the name was 'constructor', or if it's 'new' as in Dave's
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:minimal_classes proposal. It
is not just
8 matches
Mail list logo
