On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Brendan Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Don't feed the trolls.)
>
If that was in response to me, I'd rather not be called a troll and I don't
really understand how my post was troll-like but nevertheless I apologise if
it appeared that way - I wasn't aware my s
On Mar 23, 2008, at 8:08 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
> 2008/3/23 Lemonade Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> The proposed ECMAScript 4 standard contains very different
>> paradigms to the
>> current JavaScript/ECMAScript standard. In my view, it is the
>> equivalent of
>> the changes between C and C+
From: "Brendan Eich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[responding to David Teller's post in response to some questions I raised]
> You really should read the papers, and Andreas Gal's blog. Runtime
> types are only one of many kinds of information available to runtime
> optimizers. Tracing loops allows hoisting
2008/3/23 Lemonade Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The proposed ECMAScript 4 standard contains very different paradigms to the
> current JavaScript/ECMAScript standard. In my view, it is the equivalent of
> the changes between C and C++ - it's designed largely to be a revolution
> rather than a mere e
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Mike Shaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I suspected that. It is the problem with Google Mail, which exhibited
> > a bug in Firefox.
>
> Sorry, do you mean that this is caused by Arra
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspected that. It is the problem with Google Mail, which exhibited
> a bug in Firefox.
Sorry, do you mean that this is caused by Array.generic behaviour?
I'm lost as to what bug you're talking about (bug number?).
Mik
The proposed ECMAScript 4 standard contains very different paradigms to the
current JavaScript/ECMAScript standard. In my view, it is the equivalent of
the changes between C and C++ - it's designed largely to be a revolution
rather than a mere evolution of the current ECMAScript/JavaScript standard
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspected that. It is the problem with Google Mail, which exhibited
> a bug in Firefox.
>
> Use case:
> 0) hit reply
> 1) click 'send'
> 2) hit 'stop'
> 3) click 'reply to all' and watch the To: field change.
3.5):
I suspected that. It is the problem with Google Mail, which exhibited
a bug in Firefox.
Use case:
0) hit reply
1) click 'send'
2) hit 'stop'
3) click 'reply to all' and watch the To: field change.
4) watch Gmail send a mail *instantly*. Gmail displays headers in the
'show details' for all recipien
