Re: application/* mime-types and SVN [Was Re: Forwards-compatible syntax proposal]

2008/5/14 Mike Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ok. So it's a content-type which is not a mime-type even though it looks > like one? > Is there a separate recommendation that defines a mime-type for ecmascript? http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4329.txt> -- David "liorean" Andersson __

application/* mime-types and SVN [Was Re: Forwards-compatible syntax proposal]

2008/5/14 zwetan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Mike, > > 2008/5/13 Mike Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > 2008/5/13 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > what about > > > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:versioning > > > and > > > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=discussion:

Re: Forwards-compatible syntax proposal

Hi Mike, 2008/5/13 Mike Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > 2008/5/13 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > what about > > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=proposals:versioning > > and > > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=discussion:versioning > > [snip] > > On developer tools and mime-types, s