Hi Martin,
Is this the one you are after? Register System Time Difference (0x092C:0x092F)
[cid:image002.png@01D8FF21.C0EE0E60]
Regards,
Graeme.
From: Etherlab-dev On Behalf Of Steih,
Martin
Sent: Friday, 26 November 2021 22:19
To: etherlab-dev@etherlab.org
Subject: [Etherlab-dev] Register
Hi Mark,
The mbg readme has the following note:
The Mailbox Header has a Cnt parameter (bits 5-7 of the last byte
of the header). If this value is zero the slave should always
accept the incoming mailbox request. If the value is non-zero (1-7)
then the slave will only accept the request
mber 2020 10:24 pm
To: Graeme Foot
Cc: etherlab-dev@etherlab.org
Subject: Re: Improved debugging and behavior on sick SII contents
Hi, Graeme,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 09:40:37PM +, Graeme Foot wrote:
> I see you checked in some extra debugging on SII content a couple of
> weeks ago. Ha
checking the dc registers (which may also
be initialised from the EEPROM). This state now blocks until bit 0 is set (PDI
operation/EEPROM loaded bit) and error's out if there is a timeout.
Regards,
Graeme Foot.
0002-retry-dc-register.patch
Description: 0002-retry-dc-register.patch
--
Etherlab-dev
ad request.
I'm not using any patch to disable automatic rescan as far as I'm aware. I'm
only using your patchset and the extra's I've submitted.
Cheers,
Graeme.
From: Gavin Lambert
Sent: Thursday, 26 September 2019 1:13 PM
To: Graeme Foot ; etherlab-dev@etherlab.org
Subject: RE: Hot plugg
.
From: etherlab-dev On Behalf Of Graeme Foot
Sent: Tuesday, 24 September 2019 5:20 PM
To: etherlab-dev@etherlab.org
Subject: [etherlab-dev] Hot plugged modules failing to read DC register
Hi,
I've had occasional issues with EL7332 and EL7342 modules where they will go to
SafeOp + Error if you
Hi Florian,
I've come across a small bug in the default branch from commit @ rev 2597
(0e145bb05859) "Implemented EoE Set IP parameter request via command-line tool".
In master/fsm_slave.c, line 141
if (fsm->eoe_request) {
fsm->soe_request->state = EC_INT_REQUEST_FAILURE;
turn comes up. In these cases if ec_read_mbox_locked() fails
the datagram state is also set to EC_DATAGRAM_INVALID so the patch should also
cover this case.
Regards,
Graeme.
From: etherlab-dev On Behalf Of Graeme Foot
Sent: Monday, 4 March 2019 2:36 PM
To: etherlab-dev@etherlab.org
Subje
with it.
Graeme.
From: Gavin Lambert
Sent: Wednesday, 8 August 2018 3:13 PM
To: Graeme Foot ; etherlab-us...@etherlab.org
Subject: RE: Missing Vendor ID / Product Code
There’s lots of things that can cause that. Most often, I’ve seen this when
packets get lost or corrupted, so the initial discovery
Hi,
I found a couple of bugs in my patches. New patches attached.
Graeme.
-Original Message-
From: etherlab-dev [mailto:etherlab-dev-boun...@etherlab.org] On Behalf Of
Graeme Foot
Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2018 10:53 AM
To: Gavin Lambert <gav...@compacsort.com>
Cc: etherl
> From: Esben Haabendal [mailto:esbenhaaben...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Esben
> Haabendal
>
> >> Graeme Foot <graeme.f...@touchcut.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > The ec_ioctl_lock_up() and ec_ioctl_lock_down_interruptible() calls
> >> > we
> -Original Message-
> From: Esben Haabendal [mailto:esbenhaaben...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Esben
> Haabendal
> Sent: Thursday, 1 March 2018 2:02 AM
> To: Graeme Foot <graeme.f...@touchcut.com>
> Cc: etherlab-dev@etherlab.org
> Subject: Re: [etherlab-dev] EoE p
.
Thanks,
Graeme.
From: Gavin Lambert <gav...@compacsort.com>
Sent: Friday, 16 February 2018 7:47:17 PM
To: Graeme Foot; etherlab-dev@etherlab.org
Subject: RE: EoE patchs and questions
Those sound like great changes to have.
I suspect the EoE-OP thing cam
>
> Mere moments ago, quoth I:
> > On 28 April 2017 11:59, quoth Graeme Foot:
> > > 2) Your 0054 patch successfully moved the slave sdo request processing
> > > from the master fsm's idle state to be called every cycle of the master
> > > thread.
> &g
ock_64bit_time.patch)
It takes a fair bit of time creating and maintaining patches so everyone's
effort has been much appreciated.
Regards,
Graeme Foot
-Original Message-
From: etherlab-dev [mailto:etherlab-dev-boun...@etherlab.org] On Behalf Of Knud
Baastrup
Sent: Thursday, 27
Hi,
My CX2100 patch is attached.
Graeme.
From: 周甫霖 <erixc...@mapacode.tw>
Sent: Thursday, 19 January 2017 4:14:33 PM
To: Graeme Foot
Cc: etherlab-dev@etherlab.org
Subject: Re: [etherlab-dev] "Master still waiting for devices!" problem.
Hi
I can think of four possible errors at the moment:
1) Your ethercat configuration file isn't matching the correct MAC address.
In /etc/sysconfig/ethercat you have "MASTER0_DEVICE="ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff"".
ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff matches the first available device, looking at devices in the
order the
, 4 May 2016 11:13 a.m.
To: Graeme Foot
Subject: RE: [etherlab-dev] [PATCH] Default branch patchset
On Wednesday, 4 May 2016 10:55, quoth Graeme Foot:
> Are you interested in a patch that can read the SII information for a
slave from
> disk (if the slave has SII problems)?
>
> It
t [mailto:scott.till...@bhemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 3 February 2016 9:02 p.m.
To: Graeme Foot; Dr.-Ing. Matthias Schöpfer; etherlab-dev@etherlab.org
Subject: RE: [etherlab-dev] Possible Realtime Issues with Ethercat Master and
RT Preempt Kernel
Hi Graeme,
Since you brought up the typical proces
a.m.
To: 'Tillman, Scott'; Graeme Foot; Dr.-Ing. Matthias Schöpfer;
etherlab-dev@etherlab.org
Subject: RE: [etherlab-dev] Possible Realtime Issues with Ethercat Master and
RT Preempt Kernel
On 3 February 2016 21:02, quoth Tillman, Scott:
> Since you brought up the typical process cycle: I have b
Hi,
Just a thought for the day, how many EtherCAT slaves do you have and what's the
last slaves "DC system time transmission delay"?
Use the command "ethercat slaves -v" and check the last slaves "DC system time
transmission delay" value. If you have a linear topology then the complete
wire
Hi,
Re: gavinl-2004-sdo_write_size.
What I have been doing to allow one SDO Request object for all data sizes is to
call ecrt_sdo_request_read() every time before calling
ecrt_sdo_request_write(). This sets the size specific to the object you are
about to write at the expense of extra time
Hi,
This may be of help to you:
http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/2014/002645.html
http://lists.etherlab.org/pipermail/etherlab-users/2014/002647.html
Graeme.
From: etherlab-dev [mailto:etherlab-dev-boun...@etherlab.org] On Behalf Of
veeranjaneyulu
Sent: Friday, 20 February
From: etherlab-dev [mailto:etherlab-dev-boun...@etherlab.org] On Behalf Of
Gavin Lambert
On 2 February 2015 20:18, quoth Knud Baastrup:
16_improved_ethercat_rescan_performance.patch:
The SII data and PDOs will now be stored when the EtherCAT master is
in
its
operation phase. The stored
24 matches
Mail list logo
