After doing some playing with backup devices in the master, it appears
that it is configurable but not completely implemented. Is this the
case, or am I just missing something about how backup devices work in
the master?
If the former, is it on any roadmap for completion? If the latter, any
add
Hi!
Thanks a lot for your answer!
Am Mittwoch 05 Mai 2010 15:38:36 schrieb Florian Pose:
> On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 06:44:48PM +0200, Fabian Herb wrote:
> > I have a little problem with a slave generating dynamic PDOs. I get
> > warnings like this:
> >
> > EtherCAT WARNING: Slave 5 does not suppor
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 06:44:48PM +0200, Fabian Herb wrote:
> I have a little problem with a slave generating dynamic PDOs. I get warnings
> like this:
>
> EtherCAT WARNING: Slave 5 does not support assigning PDOs!
> EtherCAT WARNING: Currently assigned PDOs: (none). PDOs to assign: 0x1A85
> 0x
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 06:00:33PM -0700, Matt Jackson wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Thanks for replying. I suspect this is more of a RTW question than a
> Pdcom question.
>
> We actually are trying to bring up the output devices from Pdcom. We
> currently have a functioning Pdcom test application based
