Hello Florian,
Thanks for your reply,
I tried the official version of the ethercat master, branch stable-1.5, commit
0ece56739bf56c05bacc5de8fefa455197f4ff3c, and the result is different.
For PDO communication I'm getting what looks like 2 datagrams, 1 LRW and 1 LRD
[ 1013.015094] EtherCAT DEBU
I assume you meant domain.c.
You are correct that such a configuration *should* work, provided that the
slave actually supports it as well -- but it looks like you were just
duplicating slave indexes rather than actually specifying unique objects, which
is unlikely to work well. The SM/FMMU co
