On Tuesday 27 November 2001 11:16, you wrote:
> I'll second it. I would be GLAD to retire and become Past President.
> (grin)
>
> KBob is my first choice in fact
Ok, since Justin and Seth have seconded my motion, I move to
vote on the officers.
Further, I move to count "Nay" votes only and
kg7fu wrote:
>Shaddap or I'll smack you around.
>
>People make mistakes and people are assholes...I made a mistake
>and you are quickly going to be filed in the asshole column.
>
> - jk
>
I am not sure if I should even respond to this because it is too easy to
escalate these threads. I will, an
Do I get to be an asshole too? I've always thought I'd be a great asshole. I
really want to be a hacker when I grow up but I'll settle for being an
asshole for now. Hope none of you other assholes have taken offense to my
extensive use of the word asshole. It's not like we don't all have an ass
kg7fu wrote:
> Shaddap or I'll smack you around.
>
> People make mistakes and people are assholes...I made a mistake
> and you are quickly going to be filed in the asshole column.
i appologize.
it's funny though, that's the same thing i thought about you when i saw
that somewhat scathing mes
Shaddap or I'll smack you around.
People make mistakes and people are assholes...I made a mistake
and you are quickly going to be filed in the asshole column.
- jk
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 11:00, you wrote:
> are you going to second the motion yourself? or keep mailing this to the
> list e
> http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1004-200-7996444.html?tag=lthd
>
> AT&T gets their @home from Excite, right? Does this mean that all of
> us @home subscribers might have dead cable lines Friday? Yow!
No, I got a snail mail from AT&T, promising that service would continue...
they would have to cha
[Note: With half the conversation happening on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
half on [EMAIL PROTECTED] it requires posting to both lists until
everyone moves their responses from one list to the other. In case
you don't yet know how to subscribe to the activism list, here's how:
just send a blank mess
Can I be the rebel president?? If so, where can I get an intern? :-)
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 01:57 pm, you wrote:
> I vote that we all are "president" of the LUG! There is not "job
> description" so if we do need one president, then we should clarify the
> duties of the position.
>
> Jamie
_
Ok. I'm sold. Sign me up. The phone number to use for this is 463-1627.
A QWorst tech I spoke with said the hardware is in place they are just waiting for
FCC approval to activate it.
Patrick R. Wade ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 05:57:30PM -0800, Christopher Allen wr
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 05:57:30PM -0800, Christopher Allen wrote:
>
>On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Rob Hudson wrote:
>
>> http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1004-200-7996444.html?tag=lthd
>>
>> AT&T gets their @home from Excite, right? Does this mean that all of
>> us @home subscribers might have dead cable li
Dear Everyone.
Chris made some very good comments. He caught me on the breeder reactor
(didn't think before hitting "send" key) and did the math on the solar
stuff very well. I don't know Chris' backround either, but sure thought
his reply was well thought out and germane.
Althou
On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 01:48, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:07:52PM -0800, Jim Darrough wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm. Jobs=money=economic growth.
>
> Isn't our economy a complete farce? How much do we owe? When are
> we paying that back?
>
I don't feel that way.
> Where are these m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] run on
ListProcessor(tm), version 8.2.09/990901/11:28 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN
Revision level: 8.2.09/990901/11:28
Last update: 990901/11:28
Manager: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ListProcessor(tm) address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Port: bsdi-4-0
It has a web based interface, email interface (thats
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Rob Hudson wrote:
> http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1004-200-7996444.html?tag=lthd
>
> AT&T gets their @home from Excite, right? Does this mean that all of
> us @home subscribers might have dead cable lines Friday? Yow!
That's what it looks like. What contingency plans do eug
We still dont have email groups.. we had newsgroups and the meeting at
Allan brothers was over a year after the news group... maybe 2... I was there
for that meeting.. I remember we discussed where to have the meetings...
since outside allan bros was sucky and uninviting... we discussed oth
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:15:50PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>Yup. Long ago before that. We didn't even HAVE email groups then. I think
>we met at Allan Brothers the first time, right James?
That's my memory...
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little tempor
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1004-200-7996444.html?tag=lthd
AT&T gets their @home from Excite, right? Does this mean that all of
us @home subscribers might have dead cable lines Friday? Yow!
--
Rob
my @euglugCode = qw(v+++ e--- eug+ bsd+++ gnu+ S+++);
Ed,
There was a well-attended meeting in June (or so) of 1998 at Allan Bros.
Kaplan advertised it well, I even saw a post to comp.os.linux.announce.
Before that, the meetings were very hit and miss.
Someone (James?) collected names and emails at that meeting, but they
were never posted anywhere
Just FYI.
-Chris
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:56:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Milton Takei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Listowners listserv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Stripping attachments
To the listowners list:
Does anybody on thi
Different mailing lists on different servers, using different programs
I don't have activism or most of the other lists set to reply-to list
because
while it's commonplace, it's actaully a bad idea (for many reasons...)
Personally, I'd love to drop ezmlm from euglug.net, whatever efn uses
(m
See you Thursday at Stan's if nobody comes up with a better idea.
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Seth Cohn wrote:
> Stan's.
>
> It works, it's simple, he's offered it to us. For a discussion meeting it's
> fine, and I don't expect we will meet for too long, or have too many people.
> (if so, we'
Summer, 98? I'd just come to the realisation that I couldn't
afford both Windows 95, a new hard drive, and rent. Late summer, after a
Linux Showcase, where S.u.S.E. (before they dropped the dots) distributed
free CD's with their brand new 5.2 release, a copy of one of which I
acquired and
As a technical aside, (and I haven't paid any mind to KMail in
particular, which
you seem to be using, jk) I've been using mozilla mail (ya, the new
0.9.6 release now) and in the message filters, one of the filter options
is "To: or Cc:" instead of the default "Cc:", but of course there's also
I think my first euglug mtg was also at Allan Bro's, the one on 5th...
but that was in maybe '98 or early '99? I thin the group was being
"reinvented" again after a dead spell.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
>>Yup. Long ago before that. We didn't even HAVE email groups then. I think
>>we met at Allan
Stan's.
It works, it's simple, he's offered it to us. For a discussion meeting it's
fine, and I don't expect we will meet for too long, or have too many people.
(if so, we'll deal with that event...)
Thurs 6PM, at Stan's.
Any problems with that?
> On Tuesday 27 November 2001 10:34, you wrote:
> > Bit 'o history
> >
> > When Darrough and Kaplan resurrected the Eugene Linux
> > Users Group, Kaplan became de facto president and El Jeffe.
> Im a bit unlcear here... I dont remeber this... and I started the news
group
> back in 95 or 96..
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 10:34, you wrote:
> Bit 'o history
>
> When Darrough and Kaplan resurrected the Eugene Linux
> Users Group, Kaplan became de facto president and El Jeffe.
Im a bit unlcear here... I dont remeber this... and I started the news group
back in 95 or 96... was this befo
and every other position "beneath" the president as well. perhaps that's
what we need to do this thursday is figure out just how serious we want to
get with the LUG and the organization thereof...
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux Rocks ! [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, Nove
Whats the job description? maybe Ill apply... I seem to have the time for
it.. I do like the idea of all of us being presidents though... its sooo
anarchisiticly irrisistable (sorry about the spelling )
Jamie
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 11:16, you wrote:
> I'll second it. I would be GLAD
I vote that we all are "president" of the LUG! There is not "job description"
so if we do need one president, then we should clarify the duties of the
position.
Jamie
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 03:14, you wrote:
> OK, so it's Tuesday morning, and no signs yet of a consensus on
> where the org
Sell Out: Blocking an Open Net
Posted by JonKatz on Tuesday November 27, @10:46AM
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/11/20/1651259
>From the corporatism:-peddle-censorship-for-cash dept.
Globalism ought to be a counterforce, democratizing the world
and spreading technological and economic
Bob, that was a good lead. However, ifcfg-eth0 was not the file that
contained the gateway default; a recursive grep through the entire /etc/
listed about 5 or 6 files using 'that' IP (not counting the linuxconf
archives).
It almost looked like draknet and linuxconf duplicated efforts to manage
t
I'll second it. I would be GLAD to retire and become Past President. (grin)
KBob is my first choice in fact
As for:
> but this business of "Seth is the
> best guy for all jobs" is bunk.
I have pretty much being saying that myself for a while... and said so to
Jim Darrough
last night in fac
are you going to second the motion yourself? or keep mailing this to the
list every five minutes?
as you ask us to not cc activism, i ask that you do not repeat yourself
eighty billion times. we have the message.
> -Original Message-
> From: kg7fu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tue
Bit 'o history
When Darrough and Kaplan resurrected the Eugene Linux
Users Group, Kaplan became de facto president and El Jeffe.
Cohn, in a bloodless coup, stole the tri-corner newspaper
cap and imaginary gavel (Only Kaplan posseses the REAL
gavel deal). In fact, it was an e-mail SNAFU by w
Bit 'o history
When Darrough and Kaplan resurrected the Eugene Linux
Users Group, Kaplan became de facto president and El Jeffe.
Cohn, in a bloodless coup, stole the tri-corner newspaper
cap and imaginary gavel (Only Kaplan posseses the REAL
gavel deal). In fact, it was an e-mail SNAFU by wh
Horsehockey.
I've seen wonderful impressionist artwork by autistic individuals,
magnificent sculptures by the mentally retarded and just gawd awful
crap from university spawned "geniuses" and wet-behind the ear
rich kids with no imagination other than where to hide the needle marks.
Art requ
Here's a guy, Chris Allen, whose credibility is in question.
Unless he can tell me why he's arguing nuclear physics
with a gentleman (Mr. Darrough) who works 6 with a
reactor and has more experience and military training than
Mr. Allen has years on earth (probably).
And the lamer statement:
Bit 'o history
When Darrough and Kaplan resurrected the Eugene Linux
Users Group, Kaplan became de facto president and El Jeffe.
Cohn, in a bloodless coup, stole the tri-corner newspaper
cap and imaginary gavel (Only Kaplan posseses the REAL
gavel deal). In fact, it was an e-mail SNAFU by wh
I've received 5 badtrans infected mails so far in the last 24 hours.
You can spot this new variant _before_ your users open it via the _ that
is prepended to the from: email address.
--
Christopher Maujean
IT Director, Premierelink Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.premierelink.com/
5
On Monday 26 November 2001 20:59, Smokin Jamie wrote:
> Who wants to write RFC-KG7FU ?
>
> Jamie
KG7FU is non-GPL-able
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Horst Lueck wrote:
> Bob, thanks for explaining in detail WHAT is going on before suggesting
> HOW to fix it!
Welcome.
> When I began to educate myself about how to add/del entries in the
> routing table, I realized that the modem user has to be root in
> order to do this (not very elegant - ru
Boo Hoo. I'm found out.
Not The Other White Bob ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>Your just jelous that nobody's posing as you...
>
>On Monday 26 November 2001 21:24, Bob Crandell wrote:
>> Me thinks he complains too much.
>>
>> Linux Rocks ! ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> >While were on the topic o
OK, so it's Tuesday morning, and no signs yet of a consensus on
where the organisational meeting will be.
I can't say why noticing that [EMAIL PROTECTED] subscriptions
approach a hundred makes me sure we need a bit of organisation, but there
we are. The second officer we need to a
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:07:52PM -0800, Jim Darrough wrote:
>
> Hmmm. Jobs=money=economic growth.
Isn't our economy a complete farce? How much do we owe? When are
we paying that back?
Where are these mines? Even if noone lives there, is that not an
irreplacable resource (the fact that it i
Bob, thanks for explaining in detail WHAT is going on before suggesting
HOW to fix it!
'route' seems to reveal the problem -- I have 3 clips attached (plus 2
from 'routetrace').
Interestingly, while pppd is running, a restart of eth0 shows:
"RTNETLINK answers: File exists"
My kppp 2.4.1 was se
46 matches
Mail list logo
