Re: [Eug-lug]vulnerable.org WTH?

2003-03-19 Thread Larry Price
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Cory Petkovsek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 08:50:15PM -0800, Ben Barrett wrote: > > Wow, check out this cool new website I found: > > http://vulnerable.org > > I think you can ssh in, too -- use your own password!! > I tried to ssh in but it didn't like "cory" with some p

Re: [Eug-lug]vulnerable.org WTH?

2003-03-19 Thread Patrick R. Wade
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 08:50:15PM -0800, Ben Barrett wrote: > >Wow, check out this cool new website I found: >http://vulnerable.org >I think you can ssh in, too -- use your own password!! > >very nice... very nice indeed. I feel there must be a fun story behind >how DNS's get something without me

Re: [Eug-lug]LWN reviews Gentoo

2003-03-19 Thread dsoper
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 07:56:48PM -0800, Mr O wrote: > Has a lot in common with LFS but is not quite LSB compliant. > That's been discussed in one of the recent newsletters on > Gentoo's site. I'm not as concerned with LSB though until more > (commercial style) programs and/or drivers start adver

Re: [Eug-lug]vulnerable.org WTH?

2003-03-19 Thread Cory Petkovsek
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 08:50:15PM -0800, Ben Barrett wrote: > Wow, check out this cool new website I found: > http://vulnerable.org > I think you can ssh in, too -- use your own password!! I tried to ssh in but it didn't like "cory" with some password. > very nice... very nice indeed. I feel the

Re: [Eug-lug]vulnerable.org WTH?

2003-03-19 Thread Roger
Around Wed,Mar 19 2003, at 08:50, Ben Barrett, wrote: > Wow, check out this cool new website I found: > http://vulnerable.org > I think you can ssh in, too -- use your own password!! > > very nice... very nice indeed. I feel there must be a fun story behind > how DNS's get something without me

[Eug-lug]vulnerable.org WTH?

2003-03-19 Thread Ben Barrett
Wow, check out this cool new website I found: http://vulnerable.org I think you can ssh in, too -- use your own password!! very nice... very nice indeed. I feel there must be a fun story behind how DNS's get something without me getting a whois entry. Anyone know? = ) ben b PS - oh b'jeezu

[Eug-lug]perl one-liners

2003-03-19 Thread Ben Huot
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-p102.html?ca=dgr-lnxw121liners2 -- ^ ^ (*) (*) <= \ / => o o ? /// \ /// % /// @ /////

Re: [Eug-lug]LWN reviews Gentoo

2003-03-19 Thread Mr O
Has a lot in common with LFS but is not quite LSB compliant. That's been discussed in one of the recent newsletters on Gentoo's site. I'm not as concerned with LSB though until more (commercial style) programs and/or drivers start advertising the capability to work with LSB distros. --- Bob Mill

[Eug-lug]LWN reviews Gentoo

2003-03-19 Thread Bob Miller
Linux Weekly News reviews Gentoo this week. Unfortunately, it's subscriber-only content. Get a subscription ($5/month) or wait a week for it to be free and take a look. The author says it has a lot in common with Linux From Scratch, which I hadn't realized. http://lwn.net/Articles/25360

Re: [Eug-lug]X on startup; runlevel standards

2003-03-19 Thread Ben Barrett
Cory, here is an excerpt by Bruce Perens, from a discussion of LSB: This has already come up in informal discussion. Run-levels, and the ordering numbers that scripts like "/etc/rc2.d/S20sendmail" get, should be handled _symbolicaly_. For example run-levels should have symbolic nam