On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:10:42 -0700, Kent Loobey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I give up. How do I get off of this list?
Eventually the mail stops, the pounding headache on the other hand
just gets worse and worse.
If you (kent) receive more than one copy of this message, something is
seriou
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:36:54 -0700, Allen Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rob Hudson wrote:
> >
> > I always thought it was that more users means a bigger install
> > base means it is more attractive as a target so more viruses
> > and exploits are written to target Linux.
>
> That was Microsha
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
type your email address and press unsubscrbe
i think you already tried that though when you got the error that the
mail couldn't be delivered.
otherwise try [EMAIL PROTECTED]
maybe they can help you with this...
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 17:10 -0700,
You should know my now that you're here to stay, Brer Fox.
http://www.otmfan.com/html/brertar.htm
Kent Loobey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Okay, I give up. How do I get off of this list?
>
> ___
> EUGLUG mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.
Okay, I give up. How do I get off of this list?
___
EUGLUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
On Monday 25 October 2004 3:36 pm, Allen Brown wrote:
> That was Microshaft's rationalization. They were just trying
> to draw attention away from the fact that their system was
> an attractive target because it was *so* easy to break into.
Hear, hear! You have that exactly right. And the near
horst wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:28:25 +
> > From: Bob Crandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Voting Booth: Cast Your Vote On Microsoft vs. Open Source
> > Cast Your Vote Now!
>
> Security issues will be decided on the battle ground, not at
> some html checkBox/radioButton.
This isn
Rob Hudson wrote:
>
> I always thought it was that more users means a bigger install
> base means it is more attractive as a target so more viruses
> and exploits are written to target Linux.
That was Microshaft's rationalization. They were just trying
to draw attention away from the fact that t
I saw an article recently that mentioned modwall and I've never heard of
it.
Modwall (from MODular fireWALL) (http://www.stearns.org/modwall)
provides firewall building blocks -- short sections of firewall rule set
than an administrator can insert into an existing firewall.
-Rob
___
I always thought it was that more users means a bigger install base
means it is more attractive as a target so more viruses and exploits are
written to target Linux.
On 20041025.1305, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said ...
> > how come 44 % of the people think linux would be more insecure if it
> > were mor
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:05:10 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > how come 44 % of the people think linux would be more insecure if it
> > were more popular???
>
> more popular == more users
> more users == more eyes
> more eyes == more bad people
> more bad people == mor
> how come 44 % of the people think linux would be more insecure if it
> were more popular???
more popular == more users
more users == more eyes
more eyes == more bad people
more bad people == more malware/exploits/worms/viruses
Same with any other operating system.
12 matches
Mail list logo
