Hi,
I thought you might like this:
Linux Pipeline Newsletter
www.LinuxPipeline.com
Tuesday, July 19, 2005
In This Issue:
* Editor's Note: What's Buggin' Me?
* Top Linux News
- Open-Xchange Delivers Red Hat Linux Support
- Intel Backs Pro-Muni Wi-Fi Legislation
- Mozilla Unlea
Fred James wrote:
> Larry Price
> Thank you for your reply.
> (1) './configure' has an option '--enable-owfs', which I have used with
> the same results ('owfs disabled')
> (2) Yes, 'modprobe fuse' is required, and was done (no error returned -
> but I didn't run 'modprobe -l fuse' to see if it
Larry Price
Thank you for your reply.
(1) './configure' has an option '--enable-owfs', which I have used with
the same results ('owfs disabled')
(2) Yes, 'modprobe fuse' is required, and was done (no error returned -
but I didn't run 'modprobe -l fuse' to see if it is really loaded - I'll
check
what's the output of
./configure --help
and don't you need to
modprobe fuse
so that the kernel module is loaded.
On 7/20/05, Fred James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All
> I am trying to install/configure 'fuse' and 'owfs' (from tarballs) on a
> Mandrake 9.1 Linux system. 'fuse' seems to insta
All
I am trying to install/configure 'fuse' and 'owfs' (from tarballs) on a
Mandrake 9.1 Linux system. 'fuse' seems to install correctly, and then
I have added '/usr/local/lib' to both '/etc/ld.so.conf' and to 'PATH'.
But './configure' (for 'owfs') shows 'owfs' as disabled, and both
'owhttpd' and
Seems like most people use a BSD license, a GPL license or a variant of
the LGPL. At least on Opencores.org.
-Mike
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 00:14, Bob Miller wrote:
> Allen C Brown wrote:
>
> > Tux is list-relevant! And I am releasing several of the more
> > critical design featur
On 7/20/05, Bob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Allen C Brown wrote:
>
> > Tux is list-relevant! And I am releasing several of the more
> > critical design features of the underlying machine to open source.
> > That is mechanical design, and I'm not using GPL. Instead I
> > just publish the
Allen C Brown wrote:
> Tux is list-relevant! And I am releasing several of the more
> critical design features of the underlying machine to open source.
> That is mechanical design, and I'm not using GPL. Instead I
> just publish the design on my web site and invite folks to
> copy.
That would
