On 1/23/06, Russ Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob Miller wrote:
> > Here are the headers.
> >
> Comparing the headers you quote and the headers on the message you sent:
>
> Received: (qmail 18891 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2006 11:37:36 -
> Received: from euglug.org (HELO tux.eug
Bob Miller wrote:
Here are the headers.
Comparing the headers you quote and the headers on the message you sent:
Received: (qmail 18891 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2006 11:37:36 -
Received: from euglug.org (HELO tux.euglug.org) (207.189.131.194)
by chezgeek.euglug.net with SMTP;
Well I got inspired by a few other Northwest groups plus BAWUG in
California. Basically i think it would be a net thing to do and good
for the community as well that's pretty much it.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Cherba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group
Sent
BPL is signal over power lines, with the same kind of limitations of
cable modems, but without the existing infrastructure to segment out the
signal groups. So think of your cable company, taking all of those
signal lines, and putting them all on one hub? For BPL to work, the
signalling infra
EWEB's interest was far more practical .. If your power meter simply
phoned home & over the same power lines - there would be no need for
meter readers, and you could find out where you sat billwise every 10
min. if you wanted to. Customer internet BPL was a secondary thought.
Some of the bi
I've discovered an odd quirk with gkrellm2 / gkrelld on Debian and I am curious if any of you have run into it or might know why it exists. If I use gkrellm to connect to a gkrelld instance, I can't monitor any voltage or temperature sensors. The option for "sensors" doesn't even appear in the conf
Speaking of BPL, there's been alot of opposition with it within the amatuer
radio community, because if it causing intereference among the radio spectrum
that amatuers use. Supposedly, they say. The ARRL (Amatuer Radio Relay League)
is all over it I hear. But to me, its costly and a bad idea!
Since I am new to Eugene is EWEB serious about providing Internet
service to the public.
I can say that EWEB recently had a grant to look into the feasablility
of BPL ( broadband over power lines ) ... turns out the transformers /
substations or something is not of the type that works w
Speaking of that, I noticed that Sip and Surf was also listed on the website,
they are NO LONGER in the Atrim building, since I work two doors down from them.
Someone there told me that their lease was up or something?
Good site, Jason
Jason LaPier wrote:
The Strand (is that what it's called?
While I dont know the history I do know the fiber I work with is
"government" only and has something to do with regulations of some sort.
Im not aware of any private entities getting fiber from EWEB. This is
why its a big deal to sell that building to Peacehealth.. all the fiber
infrastructur
The Strand (is that what it's called?) on 8th and Charnelton (bookstore,
coffee shop and Cosmic Pizza under one roof) I believe has free WiFi. Last I
checked, 5th Street Market did as well, but I know they are doing some
contruction in the food area downstairs (Café Yumm and Metropol have moved
out
On 1/22/06, Jeff Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone know how well the wi-fi access is downtown for laptops?
Depends on precisely where you are. I've done a little bit of
wardriving through town and coverage of open APs is spotty. Someplaces
will have several to choose from and others will hav
Hello,
Can you please let your members know about the following news?
O'Reilly's Safari Books Online has just announced a new service called
Rough Cuts that gives you early access to content on cutting-edge
technologies months before it's published. Rough Cuts allows you to
purchase work-in-progr
There is a CS Colloquium this Thursday afternoon.
- Forwarded message from Cheri Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Cheri Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:49:24 -0800
Subject: UO CIS Colloquium
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMA
I didnt notice it either, but maybe it was filtered on my end.
also... I havnt been moderating for over a year (prolly 2!) I forgot the
password, and well.. Ed does a good job w/out ever complaining...
Jamie
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 10:50:45AM -0700, horst wrote:
> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:50:
I don't think it came through the list [Eug-lug] . I didn't see it, and my
procmail log shows no message of that Return-Path:/From: address --there
are many of that subject line, but none from that address.
Not in the archives either, as far as I can tell.
- Horst
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:
Edward Craig wrote:
> That I haven't noticed this may be an artifact of Gmail's spam filters.
> I wonder if examining the full headers might reveal this never passed
> through EUGLUG servers, as I infer from the lack of munged subject to
> include [Eug-lug].
Here are the headers.
Return-Path:
That I haven't noticed this may be an artifact of Gmail's spam filters.
I wonder if examining the full headers might reveal this never passed
through EUGLUG servers, as I infer from the lack of munged subject to
include [Eug-lug].
Not sure I'm the only one moderating, mostly that's an exercise in
We've been seeing a noticeable amount of spam on our mailing list
lately. Is it somehow getting past mailman's filters, or are our
moderators getting lenient?
- Forwarded message from Wm Lacey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Wm Lacey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:36:18 -0600
19 matches
Mail list logo
