[Eug-lug] Wifi Collective?

2006-10-27 Thread Rob Hudson
Someone emailed the webmaster@ address and asked about an old wiki page we apparently had regarding a wifi collective. Does anyone know about it? "The thing i was looking for initially on your wiki was the Eugene wifi collective. Does such a thing still exist?" Thanks, Rob __

Re: [Eug-lug] Random numbers that aren't random

2006-10-27 Thread Neil Parker
Mike Cherba wrote, > From what I've been reading, (including the datasheet for the ICH7 >part) your problem is that you don't actually have a Hardware Random >Number generator. There is a bug in the Linux code which assumes the >presence of a RNG based on the family type of the Chipset. Int

Re: [Eug-lug] Ubuntu and Nautilus

2006-10-27 Thread Garl Grigsby
Bob Miller wrote: Garl Grigsby wrote: For the archives, here is how you do it: sudo apt-get install nautilus-open-terminal Then log out and back in. Easy Peasy. Darn, this Linux stuff is getting too easy. No challenge anymore. The challenge is sifting through the google-nois

Re: [Eug-lug] Ubuntu and Nautilus

2006-10-27 Thread Bob Miller
Garl Grigsby wrote: > For the archives, here is how you do it: >sudo apt-get install nautilus-open-terminal > > Then log out and back in. Easy Peasy. Darn, this Linux stuff is getting too easy. No challenge anymore. -- Bob Miller K

Re: [Eug-lug] Ubuntu and Nautilus

2006-10-27 Thread Garl Grigsby
Garl Grigsby wrote: Now, for my real question. I want to add an 'Open Shell Here' option to the RMB list in Nautilus. I've tried googling for an idea of how to do this but have had no luck. Anybody know how to add options to this menu? For the archives, here is how you do it: sudo apt-get i

[Eug-lug] Ubuntu and Nautilus

2006-10-27 Thread Garl Grigsby
First to Bob, thanks. You tip on wpa-supplicant narrowed my google enough and I think I've got the WPA thing figured out. Two packages called network-manager and network-manager-gnome were the key. I can how click on the Network manager icon, select the SSID of the router I want and enter the p

Re: [Eug-lug] 2 default routes?

2006-10-27 Thread Alan
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:51:36 -0700, Mike Cherba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The easiest solution would seem to be just adding another NIC and > binding the service only to the NIC appropriate for that service. >> So if, eth0 was DSL and eth1 the T-1, then bind email to eth0 and www to > eth1.

Re: [Eug-lug] 2 default routes?

2006-10-27 Thread Quentin Hartman
On 10/27/06, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:58:07 -0700, Bob Crandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The easiest solution would seem to be just adding another NIC and binding the service only to the NIC appropriate for that service. So if, eth0 was DSL and eth1 the T-1, then

Re: [Eug-lug] 2 default routes?

2006-10-27 Thread Mark Turner
On 10/27/06, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:58:07 -0700, Bob Crandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> >>> > I'm open to suggestions.>> > Is the idea to have the T-1 and DSL be redundant and failover, or just >>  to separate the traffic, or? -ajb>>> Separate the traffic.

Re: [Eug-lug] 2 default routes?

2006-10-27 Thread Mike Cherba
> The easiest solution would seem to be just adding another NIC and binding the > service only to the NIC appropriate for that service. > So if, eth0 was DSL and eth1 the T-1, then bind email to eth0 and www to eth1. > > They will then answer only on the interface you want them to. > > -ajb Ac

Re: [Eug-lug] Random numbers that aren't random

2006-10-27 Thread Mike Cherba
Neil, From what I've been reading, (including the datasheet for the ICH7 part) your problem is that you don't actually have a Hardware Random Number generator. There is a bug in the Linux code which assumes the presence of a RNG based on the family type of the Chipset. Intel included RNGs

Re: [Eug-lug] 2 default routes?

2006-10-27 Thread Alan
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:58:07 -0700, Bob Crandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > I'm open to suggestions. >> > >> >> Is the idea to have the T-1 and DSL be redundant and failover, or just >> to separate the traffic, or? >> >> -ajb >> > Separate the traffic. The easiest solution would seem t

Re: [Eug-lug] Migrating to Debian

2006-10-27 Thread Bob Miller
Ron LeVine wrote: > I hand edited the file: XF86Config-4 in the /etc/X11/ directory and it > worked great. Now I actually have some screen real estate again. wheee. I'm sorry I didn't see your question earlier. A better way is to run this command. It leads you through a Q&A session about y

Re: [Eug-lug] Migrating to Debian

2006-10-27 Thread larry price
what's the output of uname -a? ls -l /etc/X11 should give you some idea. If you've got the full GNOME environment you can run gnome-display-preferences from the command line on Ubuntu it's a menu item under System>Preferences>Screen Resolution On 10/26/06, Ron LeVine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote