On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 07:12:41AM -0800, Bob Miller wrote:
> > Hum; but is it better? They claim to be able to offer the service
> > to dialup clients as well - not just broadband users.
>
> Define "better".
2. Preferable in regard to rank, value, use, fitness,
acceptableness, safet
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:15:56 -0800, Jeff_W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jeff_W wrote:
> >
> > > Hum; but is it better? They claim to be able to offer the service
> > > to dialup clients as well - not just broadband users.
Several of the free codecs for
Bob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff_W wrote:
>
> > Hum; but is it better? They claim to be able to offer the service
> > to dialup clients as well - not just broadband users.
>
> Define "better". Is WMV better than MPEG? Is RealAudio or AAC
> better than Ogg? Is Windows better than Net
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:12:41 -0800, Bob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff_W wrote:
> Currently, there is an open standard for VoIP and a bunch of small
> players. There's no natural monopoly as long as the bulk of users
> stay with the open protocols. If a critical number of people adopt a
Jeff_W wrote:
> Hum; but is it better? They claim to be able to offer the service
> to dialup clients as well - not just broadband users.
Define "better". Is WMV better than MPEG? Is RealAudio or AAC
better than Ogg? Is Windows better than NetBSD? AOL better than
Willamette.NET? eBooks bette
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:31:54 -0800, perdurabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not even sure Skype is the same company that puts out Kazaa. I
> don't believe that's the case, but could be wrong. Anyhow, great
> product.
google showed me this
http://ipcentral.info/blog/2004/11/more-on-skype-kazaa.h
Skype is very cool and works very well. I use it all the time on OS X,
in leiu of my work and mobile phones. It doesn't have any spyware as
far as I know (I have a pretty nazi firewall that lets me know when
weird packets are a'flowin'
I'm not even sure Skype is the same company that puts out Kaza
Bob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff_W wrote:
>
> > Skype-1.0 for Linux is out; anyone using it? It sounds very cool:
> >
> > http://www.skype.com/products/
>
> Skype uses a proprietary, incompatible protocol. I suggest you look
> at Free World Dialup (www.freeworlddialup.com), as it's
Jeff_W wrote:
> Skype-1.0 for Linux is out; anyone using it? It sounds very cool:
>
> http://www.skype.com/products/
Skype uses a proprietary, incompatible protocol. I suggest you look
at Free World Dialup (www.freeworlddialup.com), as it's completely
free[Beer] and has a couple of Linux clien
A number of my coworkers are on Skype on a combination of Windows, Linux
and OSX. It has worked pretty well so far, but I'm in the process of
finding something open source and SIP based that I can replace it with.
Any ideas? Gnomeeting is out for a number of reasons.
-Mike
On W
skype has been out for a while, several months. This is just
the latest revision.
We had a talk in corvallis last month about Asterisk.
It is an interesting collection of tools.
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jeff=5FW?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
% Skype-1.0 for Linux is out; anyone using it? It sounds
This is the one from the same people who do a spyware infested
filesharing network isn't it...? (Sharman networks, Kazaa) it's also
proprietary and nonstandard technology.
Umm, thanks, but I think I'll go for a little more trustworthy source.
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 23:34:39 -0800, Jeff_W <[EMAIL PR
Skype-1.0 for Linux is out; anyone using it? It sounds very cool:
http://www.skype.com/products/
-Jeff
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
13 matches
Mail list logo
