Re: [Eug-lug] Firefox security exploit

2006-10-05 Thread Allen Brown
larry price wrote: Allen, this may or may not work. but if you mozilla install is hosed anyhow...? take a stroll through the .mozilla/ dirs in your ~ look for the directory named {73a6fe31-595d-460b-a920-fcc0f8843232} No such animal. I didn't find anything remotely resembling this. and remo

Re: [Eug-lug] Firefox security exploit

2006-10-04 Thread larry price
Allen, this may or may not work. but if you mozilla install is hosed anyhow...? take a stroll through the .mozilla/ dirs in your ~ look for the directory named {73a6fe31-595d-460b-a920-fcc0f8843232} and remove it then edit the extensions.rdf directory to remove the entire stanza referring to it.

Re: [Eug-lug] Firefox security exploit

2006-10-04 Thread Allen Brown
sues. The NoScript 1.1.4.3 FAQ mentions Mozilla support/compatibility/workaround issues. - Original Message - From: "Allen Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group" Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 5:59 PM Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Firefox secur

Re: [Eug-lug] Firefox security exploit

2006-10-04 Thread Darren Hayes
, 2006 5:59 PM Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Firefox security exploit Warning! It totally breaks mozilla before firefox. Mozilla doesn't do anything at all now. Grr! -- Allen Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.peak.org/~abrown/ Sunday school is a prison in which children do penance for the e

Re: [Eug-lug] Firefox security exploit

2006-10-04 Thread Allen Brown
sites which I need scripts to run can be easily whitelisted. Thanks for the recommend Larry. - Original Message - From: "dooger watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group" Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 2:31 PM Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Fi

Re: [Eug-lug] Firefox security exploit

2006-10-04 Thread Darren Hayes
which I need scripts to run can be easily whitelisted. Thanks for the recommend Larry. - Original Message - From: "dooger watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group" Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 2:31 PM Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Firefox

Re: [Eug-lug] Firefox security exploit

2006-10-04 Thread dooger watts
Though all the comments at the firefox site are gaga now, yesterday showed up a pretty sensible response to all this hoopla: "Many webpages need to use JS to function correctly. It would be more use if there was a blacklist instead of a whitelist because very few websites use JS maliciously.

Re: [Eug-lug] Firefox security exploit

2006-10-04 Thread Edward Craig
Beta News claims this exploit is a fraud (among other recent news on Google) On 10/2/06, larry price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is a javascript exploit for Firefox, which could be used for remote exploitation on multiple platforms (including Linux). see: http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22

[Eug-lug] Firefox security exploit

2006-10-02 Thread larry price
There is a javascript exploit for Firefox, which could be used for remote exploitation on multiple platforms (including Linux). see: http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-6121608.html http://www.whitedust.net/speaks/3006/ http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2165470/javascript-vulnerability main worka