On Feb 19, 2008 8:44 AM, Bob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wikileaks have a lawyer, so they could pursue this. Would they have
> to appeal to reverse the court order to lock up the domain name?
>
The way the judge handled it created a bit of a quagmire in terms of
answering that question
I'll second Bob's response. Thank you for the breakdown. I really
appreciated being able to see some of the complexity here. The usual
run of the mill internet argumnets about this sort of thing tend to
involve too much of "These guys are evil! Therefore this is wrong!"
-Mike
I
marbux wrote:
> Sorry for the length, but it's an interesting case.
Don't apologize. It was all signal, no noise.
Wikileaks have a lawyer, so they could pursue this. Would they have
to appeal to reverse the court order to lock up the domain name?
Of course, the whole ordeal is great publicity
On Feb 18, 2008 10:23 PM, larry price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2008 8:25 PM, marbux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So pertinent questions might be:
> >
> > 1. Who arranged the UAE "investment" and loan?
>
> I'm sure it's entirely coincidental that Microsoft is pouring a bunch
> of
On Feb 18, 2008 8:25 PM, marbux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So pertinent questions might be:
>
> 1. Who arranged the UAE "investment" and loan?
I'm sure it's entirely coincidental that Microsoft is pouring a bunch
of money into the UAE
http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticleNew.asp?col=§ion=t
On Feb 18, 2008 10:52 AM, Garl Grigsby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why would anybody want to put money into these idiots? Maybe they have
> more lawsuits up their sleeves?
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3c28fj
>
This has to make it past the bankruptcy court before it can happen and
that's doubtful. The
I don't know why anyone would throw more money away in the direction
of SCO. I know Microsoft did about 1 or 2 years ago maybe it was 3.
Anyway I think SCOs days are numbered and there day will come sooner
or later. I do find it funny that part of this deal Darl McBride may
have to go. I don't k
larry price wrote:
unnamed middle east partners
SCO gets funding from Al Quaeda!!!?!?!?!?!?!
Terrorist lawsuit mongers.
Terrorists I tell you.
Isn't that about what SCO was anyway? All they tried to do was to spread
fear (terror) via mis-information. Sounds like a close match to m
unnamed middle east partners
SCO gets funding from Al Quaeda!!!?!?!?!?!?!
Terrorist lawsuit mongers.
Terrorists I tell you.
On Feb 18, 2008 10:52 AM, Garl Grigsby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why would anybody want to put money into these idiots? Maybe they have
> more lawsuits up their
Why would anybody want to put money into these idiots? Maybe they have
more lawsuits up their sleeves?
http://tinyurl.com/3c28fj
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
10 matches
Mail list logo
