[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Wow - NetBSD has only had eight so far this year:
> http://netbsd.org/Security/
I was talking about the whole system. The Linux kernel has only had
three this year (that I can recall).
Since NetBSD's ports are basically the same software as Linux
distributions use, it
Cory Petkovsek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 11:56:35AM -0700, Bob Miller wrote:
> > Rationale: Security is hard to get right. The smallest error may be a
> > potential exploit. (That's why we're seeing ~10 vulnerabilities a
> > week these days.) ...
>
> ~10 a week? I see
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 11:56:35AM -0700, Bob Miller wrote:
> Rationale: Security is hard to get right. The smallest error may be a
> potential exploit. (That's why we're seeing ~10 vulnerabilities a
> week these days.) If you pick and choose the fixes to install, you're
> betting that you fully
horst wrote:
> Bob, is that what you are referring to:
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-announce/2004-May/72.html
Yes.
> We are running 2.1.3 and I can't tell from
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=103
> if we'd need a full install as there is no 2.1.3 patc
In reply to:
> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:07:45 -0700
> From: Bob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Eug-lug] test message
...
> (I just updated euglug.org's mailman installation to plug the
> recent security vulnerability.
Bob, is that what you are referring to:
http://mail.python.org/piperm
