In a message dated 10/10/2002 2:35:29 PM Alaskan Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there happen to be any Dyson shells in the process of
being built, they might be noticed by the FAME or Kepler
missions (they would tend to appear to be long period
variable stars).
Robert
It seems to m
, October 10, 2002 6:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Life and SETI [was RE: Survival of the Flattest] On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, James McEnanly wrote:> Why not look for stars that are pertrubed by an unseen> body, looking for 'gravity's silhouette', as it were.This is to
CTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James
McEnanly
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 5:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Life and SETI [was RE: Survival of the Flattest]
Why not look for stars that are pertrubed by an unseen
body, looking for 'gravity's silhouette', as i
, October 10, 2002 6:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Life and SETI [was RE: Survival of the Flattest] On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, James McEnanly wrote:> Why not look for stars that are pertrubed by an unseen> body, looking for 'gravity's silhouette', as it were.This is to
- Original Message -
From: "James McEnanly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: Life and SETI [was RE: Survival of the Flattest]
>
> Why not look for stars that are pertrubed by an unseen
&g
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, James McEnanly wrote:
> Why not look for stars that are pertrubed by an unseen
> body, looking for 'gravity's silhouette', as it were.
This is to some extent what the gravitational microlensing
studies did/do. The results that were obtained in these studies
in the '90's a
Why not look for stars that are pertrubed by an unseen
body, looking for 'gravity's silhouette', as it were.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 10/9/2002 5:29:17 PM Alaskan
> Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> > On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED], responding to
>
In a message dated 10/9/2002 5:29:17 PM Alaskan Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED], responding to my comments, wrote:
> He suggests that we can't find suns transmitting signals, because those suns
> are already cloaked, and pumping energy into vast 'rin
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED], responding to my comments, wrote:
> He suggests that we can't find suns transmitting signals, because those suns
> are already cloaked, and pumping energy into vast 'ringworlds'.
Actually, more like "sphere-worlds" but that is a technical detail.
> I'd ha
In a message dated 10/9/2002 4:54:50 AM Alaskan Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My objections weren't as much to Crawford's ideas as they were to
the Andrew LePage sidebar. The problem in general however still
remains -- the significant majority of current "SETI" searches
are directed t
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Gary McMurtry wrote:
> In the collection is an
> article by Ian Crawford entitled "Where Are They?", subtitled "Maybe
> we are alone in the galaxy after all". I found this article thought
> provoking to say the least. Crawford uses the SETI results to date
> to suggest tha
11 matches
Mail list logo
