On Saturday 09 April 2011 18:48:53 Fabio Pliger wrote:
>
> I didn't like your tone either. You should ask before blaming. And if you
> think we are not doing things right you can propose fixes or propose
> yourself to do it as a volunteer ( just like every organizers this years
> and in the past ye
2011/4/9 Charlie Clark
> Am 09.04.2011, 16:10 Uhr, schrieb Giovanni Bajo :Sorry
> if you don't like my tone. I'm only trying to raise awareness of the current
> legal situation. As you are aware neither your status as a volunteer nor
> ignorance of the law is not likely to be much of the defence
Hello Giovanni,
On 2011-04-09 15:52, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> On sab, 2011-04-09 at 15:22 +0200, Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
> It's clearly written in the help popup of both fields *and* the checkbox
> that mobile number e date of birth will not be published.
Thanks for the clarification.
> Did you re
On 09/04/2011 16:20, Michael Foord wrote:
On 09/04/2011 15:46, Charlie Clark wrote:
[snip...]
The EU directive was not particularly well-drafted and explicitly
forbids the use of cookies on a website without the explicit consent
of the user in advance. Cookies that "are essential for the tech
On 09/04/2011 15:46, Charlie Clark wrote:
[snip...]
The EU directive was not particularly well-drafted and explicitly
forbids the use of cookies on a website without the explicit consent
of the user in advance. Cookies that "are essential for the technical
provision of a service" may be exemp
Am 09.04.2011, 16:10 Uhr, schrieb Giovanni Bajo :
I disagree. The form linked above clearly explains what it is going to
be published and what it is not. Moreover, if you submit the form once,
you are brought to the exact page that *will* become public, but still
in a private form; you can revie
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> On sab, 2011-04-09 at 14:37 +0100, Alex Kavanagh wrote:
> > Um, more to the point, why do they *need* your date of birth? Surely,
> > if it's just to make sure you're 18 or over, there can be a tick box
> > saying 'please tick to indicate you
On sab, 2011-04-09 at 15:48 +0200, Charlie Clark wrote:
> Am 09.04.2011, 15:22 Uhr, schrieb Stefan Schwarzer
> :
>
> > Hi everyone
> > On the talk submission form [1] there are required fields
> > for the date of birth and the mobile phone number of the
> > speaker.
> > A bit down is an - also r
On sab, 2011-04-09 at 14:37 +0100, Alex Kavanagh wrote:
> Um, more to the point, why do they *need* your date of birth? Surely,
> if it's just to make sure you're 18 or over, there can be a tick box
> saying 'please tick to indicate you're over 18'? Or is there some
> strange law I'm not aware of?
On sab, 2011-04-09 at 15:22 +0200, Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
> Hi everyone :-)
>
> On the talk submission form [1] there are required fields
> for the date of birth and the mobile phone number of the
> speaker.
>
> A bit down is an - also required - checkbox titled "I agree
> to let you publish my
Am 09.04.2011, 15:22 Uhr, schrieb Stefan Schwarzer
:
Hi everyone
On the talk submission form [1] there are required fields
for the date of birth and the mobile phone number of the
speaker.
A bit down is an - also required - checkbox titled "I agree
to let you publish my data on the web site."
Um, more to the point, why do they *need* your date of birth? Surely, if
it's just to make sure you're 18 or over, there can be a tick box saying
'please tick to indicate you're over 18'? Or is there some strange law I'm
not aware of?
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Stefan Schwarzer
wrote:
> Hi
Hi everyone :-)
On the talk submission form [1] there are required fields
for the date of birth and the mobile phone number of the
speaker.
A bit down is an - also required - checkbox titled "I agree
to let you publish my data on the web site." Does that
actually mean I can only submit a talk if
13 matches
Mail list logo
