Re: [EuroPython] Call for Reviewers

2014-02-10 Thread Michael Foord
On 10 Feb 2014, at 12:02, Michael Foord wrote: > > On 10 Feb 2014, at 11:51, Lutz Horn wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Am 10.02.14 12:39, schrieb Andreas Jung: >>> and we must not >> >> Why this? Who is forbidding open discussion? > > The interminable (and unhelpful) discussion and argument on every

Re: [EuroPython] Call for Reviewers

2014-02-10 Thread Michael Foord
On 10 Feb 2014, at 11:51, Lutz Horn wrote: > Hi, > > Am 10.02.14 12:39, schrieb Andreas Jung: >> and we must not > > Why this? Who is forbidding open discussion? The interminable (and unhelpful) discussion and argument on every single minor point makes it unfeasible for people who want to ac

Re: [EuroPython] Call for Reviewers

2014-02-10 Thread Lutz Horn
Hi, Am 10.02.14 12:39, schrieb Andreas Jung: > and we must not Why this? Who is forbidding open discussion? Lutz -- https://www.dev-random.de/~lutz/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ EuroPython 2014 – Berlin, 21th–27th July

Re: [EuroPython] Call for Reviewers

2014-02-10 Thread Andreas Jung
Hi Rob, I am sorry but we can not discuss every detail in public (and we must not). The organizing entities are the Python Software Verband e.V. in cooperation with the EuroPython Society and there is already a lot of communication and discussions going on. If a growing number of attendees there

Re: [EuroPython] Call for Reviewers

2014-02-10 Thread Rob Collins
Hi Andreas *> If you talk about the reviewer process: no, there is no public voting for talks like it was in Florence.* Would it be helpful to analyse the problem as follows? 1. EuroPython at Florence was a great success for three years 2. We are looking for the same sort of thing in Berli

Re: [EuroPython] Call for Reviewers

2014-02-09 Thread Andreas Jung
Hello Amirouche, I don't understand what you mean with "open". The EP orga team does not work differently like many other open-source or scientific conferences. If you talk about the reviewer process: no, there is no public voting for talks like it was in Florence. The reviews will be carried ou

Re: [EuroPython] Call for Reviewers

2014-02-09 Thread Dinu Gherman
Amirouche Boubekki: > Why isn't all the process *open*? Where are the sources? Why the > organisation use private mailling lists? Why financial matters must > stay hidden? Could you please elaborate a bit more on what you want to ask exactly and how that relates to the subject "Call for Reviewer

Re: [EuroPython] Call for Reviewers

2014-02-09 Thread Amirouche Boubekki
Why isn't all the process *open*? Where are the sources? Why the organisation use private mailling lists? Why financial matters must stay hidden? 2014-02-09 15:28 GMT+01:00 Andreas Jung : > Please see: > > http://blog.europython.eu/post/76109857365/call-for-reviewers-get-involved-and-and-help-the