M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 2008-12-17 15:21, Michael Foord wrote:
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
John Pinner wrote:
Hello,
This year PyCon USA has said that all talks will be recorded and if
you are not happy with this, don't submit a talk.
If we were to do the same it would save the t
On 2008-12-17 18:16, Michael Foord wrote:
>>> The question is whether allowing people who are unwilling to let us
>>> publish a recording is worth the hassle it causes - and I'm -1 on
>>> allowing it as I see no benefit.
>>>
>>> As a side benefit, I think this is more likely to persuade people to b
How about that we say something like I this:
By speaking at the EuroPython conference the speaker agrees that:
- The presentation may be recorded and distributed
- Any submitted paper or other documents may be redistributed
If a submitter objects to any of the above, he or she is required to
c
2008/12/17 Michael Foord :
> Were there any recordings made at PyCon UK. I know we had plans.
There were lots of recordings made, whether they are edited and
published yet I am not sure. That is always the problem, time for
editing them.
___
Europython-i
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
John Pinner wrote:
Hello,
This year PyCon USA has said that all talks will be recorded and if
you are not happy with this, don't submit a talk.
If we were to do the same it would save the talks organisers and
recording crew a *lot* of trouble. I mean a **lot**
Comment
On 2008-12-17 15:21, Michael Foord wrote:
> Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
>> John Pinner wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This year PyCon USA has said that all talks will be recorded and if
>>> you are not happy with this, don't submit a talk.
>>>
>>> If we were to do the same it would save the talks organiser
Hi!
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 2008-12-17 17:49, Michael Foord wrote:
>> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>> On 2008-12-17 15:21, Michael Foord wrote:
It is not making exceptions that provide the benefit... PyCon US at
least feels that there is no reason to accept a public talk where the
speake
Hello,
This year PyCon USA has said that all talks will be recorded and if
you are not happy with this, don't submit a talk.
If we were to do the same it would save the talks organisers and
recording crew a *lot* of trouble. I mean a **lot**
Comments please.
John
--
On 2008-12-17 18:26, Christian Scholz wrote:
> But that's all I have to say about this topic, you discuss and tell me
> the result. But in any case it would be good if we can make sure that CC
> licensing blurbs are signed in advance.
>
> And if we have some decision
> that we give choice to be str
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 2008-12-17 17:49, Michael Foord wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 2008-12-17 15:21, Michael Foord wrote:
It is not making exceptions that provide the benefit... PyCon US at
least feels that there is no reason to accept a public talk where the
speaker refuses
On 2008-12-17 17:49, Michael Foord wrote:
> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> On 2008-12-17 15:21, Michael Foord wrote:
>>> It is not making exceptions that provide the benefit... PyCon US at
>>> least feels that there is no reason to accept a public talk where the
>>> speaker refuses to allow it to be made
John Pinner wrote:
Hello,
This year PyCon USA has said that all talks will be recorded and if
you are not happy with this, don't submit a talk.
If we were to do the same it would save the talks organisers and
recording crew a *lot* of trouble. I mean a **lot**
Comments please.
John
--
The
2008/12/17 John Pinner :
> Hello,
>
> This year PyCon USA has said that all talks will be recorded and if
> you are not happy with this, don't submit a talk.
>
> If we were to do the same it would save the talks organisers and
> recording crew a *lot* of trouble. I mean a **lot**
>
> Comments pleas
John Pinner wrote:
Hello,
This year PyCon USA has said that all talks will be recorded and if
you are not happy with this, don't submit a talk.
If we were to do the same it would save the talks organisers and
recording crew a *lot* of trouble. I mean a **lot**
+1
Michael
Comments pleas
2008/12/17 Zeth :
> 2008/12/17 Michael Foord :
>> Were there any recordings made at PyCon UK. I know we had plans.
>
> There were lots of recordings made, whether they are edited and
> published yet I am not sure. That is always the problem, time for
> editing them.
Actually removing the complicat
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 19:06:39 Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
>
> How about that we say something like I this:
>
> By speaking at the EuroPython conference the speaker agrees that:
> - The presentation may be recorded and distributed
> - Any submitted paper or other documents may be redistribute
Zeth wrote:
2008/12/17 John Pinner :
Hello,
This year PyCon USA has said that all talks will be recorded and if
you are not happy with this, don't submit a talk.
If we were to do the same it would save the talks organisers and
recording crew a *lot* of trouble. I mean a **lot**
Comments pl
On 2008-12-17 18:26, Christian Scholz wrote:
> But that's all I have to say about this topic, you discuss and tell me
> the result. But in any case it would be good if we can make sure that CC
> licensing blurbs are signed in advance.
On this topic, as well as the streaming of selected talks, we a
18 matches
Mail list logo
