Personally I see the contemporary “autopilot by default in all traffic
conditions” policy equally as dangerous as the ill fated Pinto
Seems like auto manufacturers are taking a good thing and purposely adding an
aspect of Russian roulette to the mix - or maybe Blind Man’s Bluff.
Sent fro
On 28 May 2021 at 21:08, Mark Hanson via EV wrote:
> All manufacturing companies are constantly reducing costs, maximizing profits.
Right. And when those cost reductions make the product less safe, the long
term cost can end up being much higher.
And that's just the economic cost. The human
Hi folks
Eliminating Lidar and Radar on Tesla’s 3 and Y is a cost cutting measure. All
manufacturing companies are constantly reducing costs, maximizing profits.
Best regards
Mark
Sent from my iPhone
___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other
There is a video of this model's former configuration...it stalled half way
up. The improved model with lithium takes the trip with no problem. Probably
the model to get for San Francisco hills. Lawrence Rhodes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sak5Sfqa0Og
___
*
___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
---
I'm not sure how to read this. I think you mean brake, not break. LOL. Sorry
just really annoyed me this morning.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: EV [mailto:ev-boun...@lists.evdl.org] On Behalf Of Mark Laity-Snyder
via EV
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 5:39 AM
To: ev@lists.evdl.org
Cc: Mark Lait
So how do you determine what has priority using both vision and radar? One of
the problems Tesla has is phantom breaking. If you use both, You have a
situation where one could be saying go and the other says break. Obviously
breaking has to override go to be safe. But then the car can break
