ttp://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20220213/2fb81c05/attachment.html>
___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/arc
ttp://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20220213/2fb81c05/attachment.html>
___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/a
I got that from the link in my email.
Jay
On 2/13/22 10:11, Peri Hartman via EV wrote:
Jay, do you have a reference for the 5.9 t ? I'd like to have that so I
can pop this number on people moaning about subsidies for EVs and clean
energy, etc.
Peri
<< Annoyed by leaf blowers ?
On 13 Feb 2022 at 13:08, paul dove via EV wrote:
> Explicit subsidies accounted for only 8 percent of the total. The
> remaining 92 percent were implicit subsidies
What a load of hooey. It's all money. It's all corporate welfare -
socialism for the rich. What the freak are you doing
nt was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20220213/ccc45a18/attachment.html>
___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.ht
Jay, do you have a reference for the 5.9 t ? I'd like to have that so I
can pop this number on people moaning about subsidies for EVs and clean
energy, etc.
Peri
<< Annoyed by leaf blowers ? https://quietcleanseattle.org/ >>
-- Original Message --
From: "Jay Summet via EV"
To:
On 2/11/22 17:22, Willie via EV wrote:
On 2/11/22 5:04 PM, nathan christiansn via EV wrote:
The only problem that I see with this is that the government is making
people who do not support ev’s pay for ev charging.
A government that is 28 trillion dollars in debt should not be spending
