EVDL] Fwd: EVLN: GM's 1st 200mi EV will launch as a
driverless(autonomous) Lyft platform
> On Jul 29, 2016, Cor van de Water wrote:
>
> I did not know you need to be a tech junkie
> to understand and confirm the on-screen warning message
> "You must keep your hands on t
2016 6:35 PM
To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Fwd: EVLN: GM's 1st 200mi EV will launch as a
driverless(autonomous) Lyft platform
I was just having that conversation at work during lunch yesterday. A friend
said he rented a big SUV and it had collision assist. He s
I was just having that conversation at work during lunch yesterday. A friend
said he rented a big SUV and it had collision assist. He said if you tried to
change lanes without the blinker it would jerk you back in the lane. He said it
almost made he hit someone a couple of times so he had to tur
> On Jul 29, 2016, Cor van de Water wrote:
>
> I did not know you need to be a tech junkie
> to understand and confirm the on-screen warning message
> "You must keep your hands on the steering wheel at all times
> and take over the driving as needed"
> when you engage "autopilot”.
>
In response
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Cor van de Water via EV
wrote:
> I did not know you need to be a tech junkie
> to understand and confirm the on-screen warning message
> "You must keep your hands on the steering wheel at all times
> and take over the driving as needed"
> when you engage "autopilo
, July 29, 2016 3:40 PM
To: Willie2; Electric Vehicle Discussion List
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Fwd: EVLN: GM's 1st 200mi EV will launch as a driverless
(autonomous) Lyft platform
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Willie2 via EV wrote:
> On 07/29/2016 08:00 AM, Chris Tromley via EV wrote:
>
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Willie2 via EV wrote:
> On 07/29/2016 08:00 AM, Chris Tromley via EV wrote:
>
>> Trying to jump the gun, or even worse, calling what we have now
>> "autopilot"
>> is beyond idiotic. I have a great deal of respect for Elon Musk, but that
>> is the stupidest thing
On 07/29/2016 08:00 AM, Chris Tromley via EV wrote:
Trying to jump the gun, or even worse, calling what we have now "autopilot"
is beyond idiotic. I have a great deal of respect for Elon Musk, but that
is the stupidest thing I've seen him do.
Have you driven a Tesla with AutoPilot?
___
I'm against SDVs now, but I also disagree they are a dead end. The problem
here is that it's just plain stupid to try to go from zero autonomy to full
autonomy in one rapid sweep. Not only is the tech not ready, the public
isn't ready. This is a huge change, and we humans aren't well suited to
h
LOL!
See its started already
Sent from my iPad
> On Jul 27, 2016, at 11:40 PM, Chris Meier via EV wrote:
>
> Stop blaming Tesla, the vendors equipment doesn't look that high. US trucks
> should have guards, put your energy there, please.
> -Chris
> --
> -Chris
>
>> On July 27, 2016 2:05:0
Stop blaming Tesla, the vendors equipment doesn't look that high. US trucks
should have guards, put your energy there, please.
-Chris
--
-Chris
On July 27, 2016 2:05:05 PM CDT, Collin Kidder via EV wrote:
>I agree, people can be dangerous. If we could figure out the software
>I think self dri
This discussion is technically off-topic for the EVDL, but it seems to
strike a chord every time it comes up. At least this time it's in
connection with an EV, the Chevrolet Bolt (or is it now BoltEV?).
At least here in the US, people barely tolerate human error. That's why we
have so many la
According to
https://seriousaccidents.com/legal-advice/top-causes-of-car-accidents/ the #1
reason for an accident is distracted driving.
In this case that would seem to be the cause. It is certainly clear that the
technology involved might have increased the chance that the driver felt they
d
I agree, people can be dangerous. If we could figure out the software
I think self driving cars could be really safe. And, they'd be faster
too because the road could be run with very little gap between cars so
long as all of the cars are communicating and the cars are self
driving. But, being a so
t;>> Tesla leaves the responsibility on the driver and I'm not sure it
>will ever move away from that model.
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Peri Hartman via EV
>>> To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 1:09 PM
&
s the insurance
> companies offer them $5 less a month on their auto insurance :)
> Damon
>
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 20:15:04 +
>> To: pe...@kotatko.com; ev@lists.evdl.org; ev@lists.evdl.org
>> Subject: Re: [EVDL] Fwd: EVLN: GM's 1st 200mi EV will launch as a dr
onomous vehicle will change their minds as soon as the insurance
>> companies offer them $5 less a month on their auto insurance :)
>> Damon
>>
>>> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 20:15:04 +
>>> To: pe...@kotatko.com; ev@lists.evdl.org; ev@lists.evdl.org
>>&
er
>> trust an autonomous vehicle will change their minds as soon as the insurance
>> companies offer them $5 less a month on their auto insurance :)
>> Damon
>>
>>> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 20:15:04 +
>>> To: pe...@kotatko.com; ev@lists.evdl.org; ev@lis
5:04 +
To: pe...@kotatko.com; ev@lists.evdl.org; ev@lists.evdl.org
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Fwd: EVLN: GM's 1st 200mi EV will launch as a driverless
(autonomous) Lyft platform
From: ev@lists.evdl.org
The thing is Peri,
There are so many possibilities while driving how can one ever test software
enough to
om; ev@lists.evdl.org; ev@lists.evdl.org
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] Fwd: EVLN: GM's 1st 200mi EV will launch as a driverless
> (autonomous) Lyft platform
> From: ev@lists.evdl.org
>
> The thing is Peri,
> There are so many possibilities while driving how can one ever test software
ly careful drivers.
Peri
-- Original Message --
From: "Cor van de Water via EV"
To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List"
Sent: 26-Jul-16 10:57:17 AM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Fwd: EVLN: GM's 1st 200mi EV will launch as a
driverless (autonomous) Lyft platform
>Hi Paul,
&g
From: "Cor van de Water via EV"
To: "Electric Vehicle Discussion List"
Sent: 26-Jul-16 10:57:17 AM
Subject: Re: [EVDL] Fwd: EVLN: GM's 1st 200mi EV will launch as a
driverless (autonomous) Lyft platform
Hi Paul,
No problem - you are free to disagree.
I predict that w
Hi Paul,
No problem - you are free to disagree.
I predict that within 10 years nobody wants to deal with all those distracted
drivers who are trying to drive while also staying in contact with their
family, answering customers and colleagues and keeping their Facebook status
updated. (Almost) ev
As Cor posted, Google's nEV is a R&D platform, see
https://www.google.com/selfdrivingcar/
Google Self-Driving Car Project
To start, we're building prototype vehicles that are designed to take you
where you want to go at the push of a button—no driving required. Watch
video ...
Goog also has an aut
While technically Google cars can drive around they only travel a max speed of
25mph. They are intended as couriers and they aren't for sale as far as I know.
___
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev
25 matches
Mail list logo
